- From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1993 21:58:18 +0900 (JST)
- To: PIRARD@vm1.ulg.ac.be (Andr'e PIRARD)
- Cc: ISO10646@jhuvm.cc.titech.ac.jp, 0003858921@mcimail.com, ietf-charsets@INNOSOFT.COM, ietf-822@dimacs.rutgers.edu, ietf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, WG-CHAR@rare.nl
> >It assignes a single code point to different but similar characters > >in Japan and China. > > I thought that this was the problem of Unicode and not of ISO 10646. Correct. It was a problem of Unicode and not of DIS 10646-1.0. But, now, ISO 10646 is just as bad as Unicode. > >So, please don't say "international" when what you mean is merely > >"intereuropean". > > At least the voting is, isn't it. > Note that some even go for the bet of calling such a code "universal" :-) Isn't it the Martian way? MO --Boundary (ID uEbHHWxWEwCKT9wM3evJ5w)
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 1993 06:04:27 UTC