- From: Andr'e PIRARD <PIRARD@vm1.ulg.ac.be>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1993 10:22:42 +0200
- To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>, Multi-byte Code Issues <ISO10646%JHUVM.BITNET@ymir.claremont.edu>
- Cc: 0003858921@mcimail.com, ietf-charsets@INNOSOFT.COM, ietf-822@dimacs.rutgers.edu, ietf@cnri.reston.va.us, WG-CHAR@rare.nl
On Mon, 12 Jul 93 0:49:59 JST you said: >The problem is that, from the view point outside of Europe and US, ISO >10646 is merely a poor extension to ISO 8859-1. > >It assignes a single code point to different but similar characters >in Japan and China. I thought that this was the problem of Unicode and not of ISO 10646. >So, please don't say "international" when what you mean is merely >"intereuropean". At least the voting is, isn't it. Note that some even go for the bet of calling such a code "universal" :-) André. --Boundary (ID uEbHHWxWEwCKT9wM3evJ5w)
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 1993 01:33:50 UTC