Re: Cache behavior in the absence of a Fresh-until: header

David W. Morris:
>
>
>
>On Tue, 9 Jan 1996, Jeffrey Mogul wrote:
>
>> On the other hand, something like "Cache-control: reload" is
>> apparently procedural, but I suspect that we cannot do without
>> a few such features.
>
>Yes.  This is nice and clear.

Personally, I think that "no-cache" is much more clear than "reload".
"reload" makes me think of reload buttons on browsers, and these have
little to do with the caching of normal requests.

>Dave Morris

Koen.

Received on Wednesday, 10 January 1996 09:18:39 UTC