- From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@rcn.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 10:21:00 -0500
- To: "Larry W. Virden" <lvirden@cas.org>
- Cc: html-tidy@w3.org
You can't get rid of those warnings. Declaring the extra tags changes them from error (which causes tags to be deleted, even with --force-output yes) to a simple warning. In large part, because Tidy now knows how to treat the tag. How does your output markup look? take it easy, Charlie At 08:49 AM 12/5/2002 -0500, Larry W. Virden wrote: >I've a case where I'd like to use tidy to check files marked up with a >blend of ColdFusion and HTML. ColdFusion is a preprocessor type application >server language (think PHP, ASP, etc.). > >Right now, I have the following in a tidy config file: > >new-inline-tags: CFABORT, CFAPPLET, CFAPPLICATION, CFASSOCIATE, >CFAUTHENTICATE, CFBREAK, CFCACHE, CFCOL, CFCOLLECTION, CFCONTENT, >CFCOOKIE, CFDIRECTORY, CFELSE, CFELSEIF, CFERROR, CFEXIT, CFFILE, CFFTP, >CFGRIDCOLUMN, CFGRIDROW, CFGRIDUPDATE, CFHEADER, CFHTMLHEAD, CFHTTPPARAM, >CFINCLUDE, CFINDEX, CFINPUT, CFINSERT, CFLDAP, CFLOCATION, CFMAIL, >CFMODULE, CFOBJECT, CFPARAM, CFPOP, CFPROCPARAM, CFPROCRESULT, CFREGISTRY, >CFSCHEDULE, CFSEARCH, CFSET, CFSETTING, CFSLIDER, CFSTOREDPROC, >CFTEXTINPUT, CFTHROW, CFTREEITEM, CFUPDATE, CFWDDX >new-blocklevel-tags: CFFORM, CFGRID, CFHTTP, CFIF, CFLOCK, CFLOOP, >CFOUTPUT, CFQUERY, CFREPORT, CFSCRIPT, CFSELECT, CFSWITCH, CFCASE, >CFDEFAULTCASE, CFTABLE, CFTRANSACTION, CFTREE, CFTRY, CFCATCH > >However, > >HTML Tidy for Solaris (vers 1st June 2002; built on Jun 11 2002, at 06:28:18) > > >is generating this type of error: > >line 1 column 1 - Warning: <cftry> is not approved by W3C > >line 6 column 1 - Warning: <cfif> unexpected or duplicate quote mark > >line 8 column 1 - Warning: missing </cfsetting> before </cfif> > >etc. > >Does anyone have any ideas on how to get tidy and ColdFusion pages to >work better together? >-- >Tcl - The glue of a new generation. <URL: http://wiki.tcl.tk/ > >Larry W. Virden <mailto:lvirden@cas.org> <URL: >http://www.purl.org/NET/lvirden/> >Even if explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should >be construed as representing my employer's opinions. >-><-
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2002 10:17:43 UTC