RE: SourceForge Project Approved

+1, I vote for moving all source over so we can start working.

Tin Le
----
http://tin.le.org
Tin Le - tin@le.org
Firewall and Security Consulting


On Wed, 23 May 2001, Reitzel, Charlie wrote:

> This is great.  May I propose that we start our CVS source files direct from
> Dave Raggett's 4 Aug, 2000 version and apply your diffs?

> Does everybody want to move this stuff over to the project developer's
> forum?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Teague [mailto:teague@mailandnews.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:07 AM
> To: html-tidy@w3.org
> Subject: RE: SourceForge Project Approved

> At 4:53 PM -0400 5/21/01, Reitzel, Charlie wrote:
> >Q: does that mean no separate lib to start?
> >
> >Besides the archives to thist list, I'm thinking we have some work ahead
> >getting Terry Teague's Tidy bug pages and Dave R.'s "pending" stuff into
> >Perfect Tracker (bug tracker on SF).
> >
> >Terry Teague's Tidy Bugs:
> >http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/1057/tidybugs.html
> >http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/1057/tidybugs2.html
> >
> >Tidy "Pending" items:
> >http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/pending.html
> >

> Although I did lose a lot of my work recently in a hard drive crash, I do
> still have current copies of source to my various implementations of Tidy
> for Mac OS. I could provide source (to an unsupported command line version
> for Mac OS, that I use for testing purposes) that has all the bug fixes
> referred to by my "tidybugs" page above. It has very few Mac OS specific
> changes.

> I am at a developers conference all this week, so I won't be able to get to
> it for a little while - do you want me to import/add it directly into CVS
> at SourceForge, or would you rather do that? - I guess I could send you
> "diffs" of my code and the 04 Aug 00 release.

Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2001 21:01:10 UTC