RE: SourceForge Project Approved

This is great.  May I propose that we start our CVS source files direct from
Dave Raggett's 4 Aug, 2000 version and apply your diffs?

Does everybody want to move this stuff over to the project developer's
forum?

-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Teague [mailto:teague@mailandnews.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:07 AM
To: html-tidy@w3.org
Subject: RE: SourceForge Project Approved


At 4:53 PM -0400 5/21/01, Reitzel, Charlie wrote:
>Q: does that mean no separate lib to start?
>
>Besides the archives to thist list, I'm thinking we have some work ahead
>getting Terry Teague's Tidy bug pages and Dave R.'s "pending" stuff into
>Perfect Tracker (bug tracker on SF).
>
>Terry Teague's Tidy Bugs:
>http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/1057/tidybugs.html
>http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/1057/tidybugs2.html
>
>Tidy "Pending" items:
>http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/pending.html
>

Although I did lose a lot of my work recently in a hard drive crash, I do
still have current copies of source to my various implementations of Tidy
for Mac OS. I could provide source (to an unsupported command line version
for Mac OS, that I use for testing purposes) that has all the bug fixes
referred to by my "tidybugs" page above. It has very few Mac OS specific
changes.

I am at a developers conference all this week, so I won't be able to get to
it for a little while - do you want me to import/add it directly into CVS
at SourceForge, or would you rather do that? - I guess I could send you
"diffs" of my code and the 04 Aug 00 release.

I suppose I should look at what it would take to import existing bugs
reports into Perfect Tracker.

I imagine eventually more of this type of discussion will move to SF's
forums instead.

Regards, Terry

Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2001 13:26:02 UTC