- From: Reitzel, Charlie <CReitzel@arrakisplanet.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 13:33:10 -0400
- To: "'Randy Waki'" <rwaki@flipdog.com>
- Cc: html-tidy@w3.org
+1. As long as we maintain momentum on a library, I'm ok w/ an interim "bug fix only" release. -----Original Message----- From: Randy Waki [mailto:rwaki@flipdog.com] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:37 PM To: Reitzel, Charlie; html-tidy@w3.org Subject: RE: SourceForge Project Approved Reitzel, Charlie wrote: > > Q: does that mean no separate lib to start? > > Besides the archives to thist list, I'm thinking we have some work ahead > getting Terry Teague's Tidy bug pages and Dave R.'s "pending" stuff into > Perfect Tracker (bug tracker on SF). > > Terry Teague's Tidy Bugs: > http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/1057/tidybugs.html > http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/1057/tidybugs2.html > > Tidy "Pending" items: > http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/pending.html Hmm, good point. The separate lib was one of the things that started everyone down this path in the first place. I'd hate to see enthusiasm wane due to a "bug fix first" approach. Perhaps a good middle ground might be to just apply previously posted bug *fixes* (those that can be reasonably verified) while file names, line numbers, etc. still match up. Then go ahead with the refactoring without necessarily pausing for a release. Randy
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2001 13:33:00 UTC