RE: Xml Schema profile

Do people have good experiences using Substitution Groups
in conjunction with Databinding tools? 

Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: Boris Kolpackov [mailto:boris@codesynthesis.com]
Sent: Mon 9/25/2006 7:38 AM
To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au
Cc: paul@xmlhelpline.com; David_E3@VERIFONE.com; mike@saxonica.com; xmlschema-dev@w3c.org; lists@jeffrafter.com; Downey,P,Paul,XSB2 R
Subject: Re: Xml Schema profile
 
Hi,

Simon.Cox@csiro.au <Simon.Cox@csiro.au> writes:

> Please do not labour under the impression that substitution groups are a
> corner of the spec that rarely gets visited.

I was also somewhat surprised seeing this assumption. I did a quick search
on our XML Schema repository which brought up the following well-known
schemas besides the opengeospatiol.org's ones (GML, etc.):

OVAL (Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language) / http://oval.mitre.org
FpML (Financial products Markup Language) / http://www.fpml.org
COLLADA (COLLAborative Design Activity) / http://www.collada.org
HR-XML / http://www.hr-xml.org


hth,
-boris


-- 
Boris Kolpackov
Code Synthesis Tools CC
http://www.codesynthesis.com
Open-Source, Cross-Platform C++ XML Data Binding