W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > September 2006

RE: Xml Schema profile

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:37:02 +0100
Message-ID: <2A7793353757DB4392DF4DFBBC95225504BFEE4C@I2KM11-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <boris@codesynthesis.com>, <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Cc: <paul@xmlhelpline.com>, <David_E3@VERIFONE.com>, <mike@saxonica.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3c.org>, <lists@jeffrafter.com>

Do people have good experiences using Substitution Groups
in conjunction with Databinding tools? 


-----Original Message-----
From: Boris Kolpackov [mailto:boris@codesynthesis.com]
Sent: Mon 9/25/2006 7:38 AM
To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au
Cc: paul@xmlhelpline.com; David_E3@VERIFONE.com; mike@saxonica.com; xmlschema-dev@w3c.org; lists@jeffrafter.com; Downey,P,Paul,XSB2 R
Subject: Re: Xml Schema profile

Simon.Cox@csiro.au <Simon.Cox@csiro.au> writes:

> Please do not labour under the impression that substitution groups are a
> corner of the spec that rarely gets visited.

I was also somewhat surprised seeing this assumption. I did a quick search
on our XML Schema repository which brought up the following well-known
schemas besides the opengeospatiol.org's ones (GML, etc.):

OVAL (Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language) / http://oval.mitre.org
FpML (Financial products Markup Language) / http://www.fpml.org
COLLADA (COLLAborative Design Activity) / http://www.collada.org
HR-XML / http://www.hr-xml.org


Boris Kolpackov
Code Synthesis Tools CC
Open-Source, Cross-Platform C++ XML Data Binding
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 07:38:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:56:10 UTC