xml-editor@w3.org from January to March 2014 by author

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: Clarify that documents with DOCTYPE but without markup declaration are not subject to validation (Tuesday, 21 January)

Jirka Kosek

• Re: Clarify that documents with DOCTYPE but without markup declaration are not subject to validation (Tuesday, 21 January)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: Clarify that documents with DOCTYPE but without markup declaration are not subject to validation (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: Clarify that documents with DOCTYPE but without markup declaration are not subject to validation (Saturday, 8 February)
• Errata, validating processors: Omission of reference to ”at user option” in section 5.2 (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: Clarify that documents with DOCTYPE but without markup declaration are not subject to validation (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: Clarify that documents with DOCTYPE but without markup declaration are not subject to validation (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: Clarify that documents with DOCTYPE but without markup declaration are not subject to validation (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: Clarify that documents with DOCTYPE but without markup declaration are not subject to validation (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: Clarify that documents with DOCTYPE but without markup declaration are not subject to validation (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: Clarify that documents with DOCTYPE but without markup declaration are not subject to validation (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Clarify that documents with DOCTYPE but without markup declaration are not subject to validation (Sunday, 19 January)

Paul Grosso

• Re: Clarify that documents with DOCTYPE but without markup declaration are not subject to validation (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: Clarify that documents with DOCTYPE but without markup declaration are not subject to validation (Wednesday, 5 February)

SJ Kissane

• Re: WFC: Parsed Entity (Friday, 21 February)
• WFC: Parsed Entity (Friday, 21 February)

Last message date: Friday, 21 February 2014 13:14:17 UTC