W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition

From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 15:48:35 +0200
Message-ID: <00fe01bfc64f$edee59c0$19e581c2@brownell.org>
To: "Kay Michael" <Michael.Kay@icl.com>, "'John Cowan'" <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Cc: <xml-editor@w3.org>, <xml-dev@xml.org>, <w3t-comm@w3.org>
I'd had the same thought as well.

----- Original Message -----
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@icl.com>
To: 'John Cowan' <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Cc: <xml-editor@w3.org>; <xml-dev@xml.org>; <w3t-comm@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition

> > A change to the XML version number would make existing 1.0 XML
> > parsers unable to cope.  Since we are not making incompatible
> > changes, a new version would be inappropriate.
> E62, which requires the separator in Names and NMTOKENS to be a single
> rather than any sequence of whitespace characters, looks like a rather
> incompatibility to me!
> And the only justification given is SGML compatibility, so why on earth
> wasn't this made a "for interoperability" rule which most of us can
> ignore?
> Mike Kay
> This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
> To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
> List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
Received on Thursday, 25 May 2000 09:47:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:30 GMT