Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition

> Instead, I would propose another level of validity "character validity"
> which XML processors should be encouraged, but not required, to support,
> or to support as much as they can. Unlike validity, which sits on top
> of well-formedness, "character validity" sits more-or-less underneath
> well-formedness as XML's soft underbelly.

AAck!!  NO!!  Unneeded complexity, leading to interop bugs.

- Dave