W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > April to June 2000

RE: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition

From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 15:26:42 +0100
To: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Cc: xml-dev@xml.org, xml-editor@w3.org
Message-ID: <001101bfc655$3f5c5a00$ab20268a@pc-lrd.bath.ac.uk>
> XML 1.0, Second Edition, will incorporate the published errata into
> the text of the XML Recommendation.  It is not XML 1.1.  It is not
> considered a substantial change in XML.

Can it be assumed then that the list of possible changes for XML "2nd 
Edition" is separate to any likely outcome of the discussion playing 
out on xml-uri?

In other words whats the relationship between the two, if any?


Leigh Dodds, Systems Architect       | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic |    sine necessitates"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant    |     -- William of Ockham
Received on Thursday, 25 May 2000 10:36:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:39 UTC