Rich Salz wrote: >>That's a different MEP. If your transport gives you request-response >>natively, you use "request-response with optional SOAPiness". If it >>gives you true fire and forget, you use "fire-and-forget one-way" (TBD). >> >> > >Thanks for the clarification. > >Do you htink it's legitimate for parts of the SOAP stack to turn a "no >SOAP response" from the transport/transfer layer, into an empty soap >message? > > I've proposed it (it's "DH1" on the table I sent a while ago), but I'm no longer so sure it's the best way to go. > /r$ > >Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2006 18:09:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:21 GMT