W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2006

Re: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:45:39 -0500 (EST)
To: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
cc: "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0601101243170.1892-100000@smtp.datapower.com>

> That's a different MEP.  If your transport gives you request-response
> natively, you use "request-response with optional SOAPiness".  If it
> gives you true fire and forget, you use "fire-and-forget one-way" (TBD).

Thanks for the clarification.

Do you htink it's legitimate for parts of the SOAP stack to turn a "no
SOAP response" from the transport/transfer layer, into an empty soap
message?
	/r$
-- 
SOA Appliance Group
IBM Application Integration Middleware
* This address is going away; please use rsalz@us.ibm.com *
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2006 17:45:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:21 GMT