W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2006

Re: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:59:51 -0500 (EST)
To: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
cc: "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0601101457520.20222-100000@smtp.datapower.com>

> >Do you htink it's legitimate for parts of the SOAP stack to turn a "no
> >SOAP response" from the transport/transfer layer, into an empty soap
> >message?
> >
> >
> I've proposed it (it's "DH1" on the table I sent a while ago), but I'm
> no longer so sure it's the best way to go.

It seems to me that *not* doing it requires WSDL knowledge to be embedded
pretty deeply into the SOAP stack or distributed among all intermediaries
that may be involved in hte message.  Either way, that seems like a bad
idea.

	/r$

-- 
SOA Appliance Group
IBM Application Integration Middleware
* This address is going away; please use rsalz@us.ibm.com *
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2006 20:00:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:21 GMT