W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2001

RE: Formalism in SOAP spec

From: MacAndrew, Tim <tmacandrew@NetSilicon.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:57:39 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <AD77174F26BFD411BE7B00508BFDF56211FFAE@newbury.netsilicon.com>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>
Cc: "Jones, Matthew" <MJones@NetSilicon.com>, "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

... and it's a good technique for Teabags who
want to distract people from their mistakes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:marting@develop.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 5:47 AM
To: MacAndrew, Tim; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com;
Cc: xschema@us.ibm.com; Jones, Matthew
Subject: Re: Formalism in SOAP spec

> Also, if I could suggest that naming of an
> <attribute> (e.g. "NOTATION") that is the same as
> a <complexType> that is also a "built-in" Schema type
> is confusing.  Although it is "legal" Schema (an
> exercise in namespacing?), it is difficult to read.

Schema has six non-overlapping symbol spaces. So there is no confusion
the part of a software although I agree it may sometimes be confusing


Martin Gudgin
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2001 14:09:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:16 UTC