W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2001

Re: Formalism in SOAP spec

From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:41:35 -0500
Message-ID: <00c101c16e59$5abc5040$6eb86b83@greyarea>
To: "MacAndrew, Tim" <tmacandrew@NetSilicon.com>
Cc: "Jones, Matthew" <MJones@NetSilicon.com>, "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I'm not sure I understand the Teabag reference. Could you elucidate, please?

Thanks

Martin

----- Original Message -----
From: "MacAndrew, Tim" <tmacandrew@NetSilicon.com>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>
Cc: "Jones, Matthew" <MJones@NetSilicon.com>; "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen"
<henrikn@microsoft.com>; <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>; <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:57 AM
Subject: RE: Formalism in SOAP spec



... and it's a good technique for Teabags who
want to distract people from their mistakes.


-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:marting@develop.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 5:47 AM
To: MacAndrew, Tim; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com;
xml-dist-app@w3.org
Cc: xschema@us.ibm.com; Jones, Matthew
Subject: Re: Formalism in SOAP spec

>
> Also, if I could suggest that naming of an
> <attribute> (e.g. "NOTATION") that is the same as
> a <complexType> that is also a "built-in" Schema type
> is confusing.  Although it is "legal" Schema (an
> exercise in namespacing?), it is difficult to read.

Schema has six non-overlapping symbol spaces. So there is no confusion
on
the part of a software although I agree it may sometimes be confusing
for
wetware.

Regards

Martin Gudgin
DevelopMentor
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2001 23:45:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:04 GMT