W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > May 2001

RE: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction

From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 13:14:49 +0100
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F1923F0@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'Mark Nottingham'" <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: XML Distributed Applications List <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Hi Mark,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net]
> Sent: 01 May 2001 03:30
> To: XML Distributed Applications List
> Subject: RE: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
> 
<snip/>

> 
> RE: response code - the IANA registry is at 
>   http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/http-status-codes
> 

I found that too, and found it hard to believe that is was the registry
rather than a brief extract from RFC2817. I would have expected a registry
to give a complete listing of assigned codes (including those specified in
the HTTP spec) and a reference to the process by which additional codes get
assigned. I'm also curious about what happens if there is demand for more
than 100 different forms of "Bad Request" ie 4xx.

<snip/>

> -- 
> Mark Nottingham
> http://www.mnot.net/

Stuart
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2001 08:15:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:01 GMT