- From: Alex Ceponkus <aceponkus@bowstreet.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:55:00 -0500
- To: "'MOREAU Jean-Jacques'" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
I agree with adding the examples. We might also want to consider adding a
few words to avoid confusion with authentication/authorization. The word
'security' means more than just encryption. For example, the S2ML (Security
Services Markup Language) defines authentication and authorization
mechanisms and is considered a security mechanism, but would be layered on
top of XP, not underneath.
Alex
--
Alex Ceponkus
Technical Lead, Web Services Standards
Bowstreet
-----Original Message-----
From: MOREAU Jean-Jacques [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 11:28 AM
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Subject: DR 608: specific security mechanisms
I propose that, as suggested by by Henryk in [1], we list the
following protocols: SSL and S/MIME.
The XP specification should not preclude the use of XP
messaging over popular security mechanisms
(SSL and S/MIME).
Jean-Jacques.
[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2000Nov/0043.html
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 17:58:31 UTC