W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2000

RE: DR 608: specific security mechanisms

From: Alex Ceponkus <aceponkus@bowstreet.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:55:00 -0500
Message-ID: <849D30D91B33D41181EB00B0D020AA8C0225D01F@mail.hq.bowstreet.com>
To: "'MOREAU Jean-Jacques'" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
I agree with adding the examples.  We might also want to consider adding a
few words to avoid confusion with authentication/authorization.  The word
'security' means more than just encryption.  For example, the S2ML (Security
Services Markup Language) defines authentication and authorization
mechanisms and is considered a security mechanism, but would be layered on
top of XP, not underneath.


Alex Ceponkus
Technical Lead, Web Services Standards

-----Original Message-----
From: MOREAU Jean-Jacques [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 11:28 AM
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Subject: DR 608: specific security mechanisms

I propose that, as suggested by by Henryk in [1], we list the
following protocols: SSL and S/MIME.

              The XP specification should not preclude the use of XP
              messaging over popular security mechanisms
              (SSL and S/MIME).


Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 17:58:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:10 UTC