I would prefer to see this phrased in terms of the XP application determining whether a given message conforms to a version of XP that the application recognises rather than in terms of comparison of twos messages. I don't think evolution is defined in terms of messages being compatible with each other but in terms of messages conforming to a given version of XP. I'm also having some difficulty understanding what the last sentence means. How can an XP envelope *mandate* that an application be extended? GudgeReceived on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 17:56:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:57 GMT