I think this needs rewording a little. I'm not clear as to what an 'XP fault message' is. I *think* what the DR is trying to say is 'we don't want to define a special type of message called fault message which doesn't use XP envelope' but this is not clear ( to me at least ) GudgeReceived on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 18:01:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:57 GMT