W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2000

Re: [DR702] Evolution

From: Oisín Hurley <ohurley@iona.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 11:55:21 -0000
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002f01c0547b$172e1320$9f03020a@psychobilly>
>I would prefer to see this phrased in terms of the XP application
>determining whether a given message conforms to a version of XP that the
>application recognises rather than in terms of comparison of twos messages.
>I don't think evolution is defined in terms of messages being compatible
>with each other but in terms of messages conforming to a given version of

Hi Martin,
Hopefully the new wording that leaves out the 'comparison' is more
to you.

>I'm also having some difficulty understanding what the last sentence means.
>How can an XP envelope *mandate* that an application be extended?

Sorry, wording a bit raggy there. What this is meant to mean is that
the it may be mandatory for an XP processor to process certain extensions
or fail.

Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2000 06:55:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:10 UTC