W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2000

RE: [DR702] Evolution

From: Eric Newcomer <eric.newcomer@iona.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 08:38:52 -0500
To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>, "XML Protocol Comments" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NEBBKMANEDOHCJIPGKCHGEOOCPAA.eric.newcomer@iona.com>
Well, that means that an application might be able to tell when it's trying
to generate a message for a new or different version of the protocol, but
how would the receiver of a message (the SOAP processor) be able to tell
that the message it's receiving is compatible with the version (or versions)
of the protocol that it implements?


Eric Newcomer
IONA Technologies
200 West Street
Waltham, MA 02451
Tel: +1 781 902 8366
Fax: +1 781 902 8001

-----Original Message-----
From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Martin Gudgin
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 5:55 PM
To: XML Protocol Comments
Subject: [DR702] Evolution

I would prefer to see this phrased in terms of the XP application
determining whether a given message conforms to a version of XP that the
application recognises rather than in terms of comparison of twos messages.
I don't think evolution is defined in terms of messages being compatible
with each other but in terms of messages conforming to a given version of
XP.

I'm also having some difficulty understanding what the last sentence means.
How can an XP envelope *mandate* that an application be extended?

Gudge
Received on Thursday, 16 November 2000 08:38:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:57 GMT