W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2007

Re: MessageTest-3G Assertions

From: Youenn Fablet <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:26:01 +0100
To: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Cc: "'www-ws-desc'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-id: <45DDA7F9.5060203@crf.canon.fr>

I agree on GET.
Having a content-type on PUT seems reasonnable to me.
I was also thinking that DELETE may not need a content-type.
What do you think?
    Youenn

Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> I think I agree, and have updated the assertion generator to omit assertions
> about content-type on GET and PUT methods (this isn't a complete fix - it
> doesn't take safety into account, but seems sufficient for the existing
> tests.)
>
> Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
>  
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 6:04 AM
>> To: Jonathan Marsh
>> Cc: www-ws-desc
>> Subject: MessageTest-3G Assertions
>>
>> The MessageTest-3G test case bounds some operations to GET and DELETE.
>> For those operations, the test framework checks that the content-type
>> header is set to "application/x-www-form-urlencoded".
>> I am wondering whether we should remove these assertions.
>> What do you think?
>> Regards,
>>     Youenn Fablet
>>     
>
>
>   
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 14:26:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:46 GMT