W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2007

RE: MessageTest-3G Assertions

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:31:16 -0800
To: "'Youenn Fablet'" <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: "'www-ws-desc'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <01be01c756c8$c9b37de0$1501010a@DELLICIOUS>

Changed PUT to DELETE.

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 6:26 AM
> To: Jonathan Marsh
> Cc: 'www-ws-desc'
> Subject: Re: MessageTest-3G Assertions
> 
> I agree on GET.
> Having a content-type on PUT seems reasonnable to me.
> I was also thinking that DELETE may not need a content-type.
> What do you think?
>     Youenn
> 
> Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> > I think I agree, and have updated the assertion generator to omit
> assertions
> > about content-type on GET and PUT methods (this isn't a complete fix -
> it
> > doesn't take safety into account, but seems sufficient for the existing
> > tests.)
> >
> > Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com -
> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 6:04 AM
> >> To: Jonathan Marsh
> >> Cc: www-ws-desc
> >> Subject: MessageTest-3G Assertions
> >>
> >> The MessageTest-3G test case bounds some operations to GET and DELETE.
> >> For those operations, the test framework checks that the content-type
> >> header is set to "application/x-www-form-urlencoded".
> >> I am wondering whether we should remove these assertions.
> >> What do you think?
> >> Regards,
> >>     Youenn Fablet
> >>
> >
> >
> >
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 21:31:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:46 GMT