W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2007

Agenda: 8 February 2007 WS Description telcon

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:17:40 -0800
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <008501c74b05$c974e770$3501a8c0@DELLICIOUS>


0.  Dial in information (members only) [.1]:

See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.

If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before
the start of the telcon.

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2007Feb/0003.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda

1. Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
      Glen Daniels, Tom Jordahl, Amy Lewis, Paul Downey, Arthur Ryman, 
      Asir Vedamuthu, Monica Martin

--------------------------------------------------------------------
2.  Approval of minutes:
  - Feb 1 [.1]

[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Feb/att-0004/20070201-ws
-desc-minutes.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------
3.  Review of Action items [.1].

[Interop]
?         2006-11-30: [interop] John Kaputin to create a test case 
                      with "required=false". 
?         2006-12-14: [interop] Jonathan to fix transferCodings - 
                      add control group

[WG]
?         2006-09-21: Jonathan to check periodically that SPARQL has 
                      added schemaLocation.
?         2006-12-14: plh to come up with a more detailed proposal for 
                      CR112 if possible
?         2007-01-04: Paul to report back on which test cases in the 
                      WSDL test suite fail the basic patterns, with
                      suggestions on how to address the issues.
?         2007-01-11: Jean-Jacques to provide more analysis on how 
                      difficult it would be deal with a Policy that 
                      only contains an MTOM policy assertion 
DONE [.3] 2007-02-01: Arthur to review the WSDL 1.1 identifier spec.
DONE [.4] 2007-02-01: Jonathan to provide an enhanced option 1 for issue 
                      117 by next week, using bits from the other 
                      proposals as indicated above.

Current Editorial Action Items

Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2].

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/actions_owner.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Feb/0002.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Feb/0039.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------
4.  Administrivia
  - Interchange format draft Note [.1] (plan to skip over quickly for today)
  - SOAP One-way MEP [.2] comments [.3]
  - WSDL 1.1 identifiers review [.4] draft comments [.5, .6]
  - WS-Addressing Metadata LC [.7] volunteers?

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/0044.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2007Jan/0016.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2007Jan/0018.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2007Jan/0020.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Feb/0002.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Feb/0032.html
[.7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Feb/0015.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------
5.  MTOM Description (plan to skip over quickly for today)
  - Paul's proposal [.1]
  - Jonathan/Asir's counter-proposal [.2]
  - WS-MTOM Policysubmission [.3]
  - XMLP New charter [.4]

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Nov/0029.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/0016.html
[.3] http://www.w3.org/Submission/2006/SUBM-WS-MTOMPolicy-20061101/
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2007Jan/0012.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
6.  Issue CR112: HTTP Location property definition [.1]
  - ACTION: plh to come up with a more detailed proposal for CR112 
            if possible

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR112

-----------------------------------------------------------------
7.  Issue CR117: Re: 6.7.1.1 Construction of the request IRI using the 
                 http location [.1]
  - ACTION: Jonathan to analyze CR117 further [.2].
  - options:
	Option 0: status quo - nothing is encoded
	Option 1: Jonathan's 1st - new syntax for controlling whether or 
                not to encode [.4]
	Option 2: Youenn - path parts raw, parameters encoded [.5]
	Option 3: Jonathan's 2nd - everything encoded, ambiguity forbidden
	Option 4: Jacek's - all is raw, we warn people, give them guidance 
                and maybe a restrictive simple type
	Option 5: everything encoded
  - Youenn's analysis [.3]
  - ACTION: Jonathan to provide an enhanced option 1 for issue 117 by 
            next week, using bits from the other proposals as 
            indicated above. [.4]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR117
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Jan/0162.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Jan/0209.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Feb/0039.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Feb/0040.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
8.  Issue CR143: Tranfer-Encoding vs Content-Encoding [.1]
  - Feedback from experts?
      Mark Nottingham reminds us of CR011 [.2], which points out 
      Transfer-Coding as inappropriate.

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR143
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR011

-----------------------------------------------------------------
9.  Issue CR146: Ignoring uncited and nillable [.1]
  - proposal [.2]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR146
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Jan/0208.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue CR147: RFC: operation safety as semantic annotation? [.1]
  - remove safety altogether? [.2]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR147
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Jan/0211.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue CR129: RE: Comment on Fragment [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR129

-----------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue CR132: RE: Proposal for CR108 [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR132

-----------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue CR136: What does this table row mean [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR136

-----------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue CR137: Spelling mistake in Part 2 [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR137

-----------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue CR138: {element declaration} for Interface Fault component [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR138

-----------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue CR139: Suggestion on Part - 2: Adjuncts [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR139

-----------------------------------------------------------------
17. Issue CR142: Leftovers of trailing slashes in replacement 
                 parameters [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR142

-----------------------------------------------------------------
18. Issue CR148: Re: LocationTemplate-1G totally hosed ;-) [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR148

-----------------------------------------------------------------
19. Issue CR149: Re: rpc:signature question. [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR149

-----------------------------------------------------------------
20. Issue CR150: Assertion Summary Texts in Part 1 [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR150

-----------------------------------------------------------------
21. Issue CR151: XML Syntax Summary in Part 1 [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR151

-----------------------------------------------------------------
22. Issue CR152: Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only 
                 define faults [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR152

-----------------------------------------------------------------
23. Issue CR153: The WSDL 2.0 namespace - will it change? [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR153

-----------------------------------------------------------------
24. Issue CR021: Re: WSDL describing Interface operation safety [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR021
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 22:17:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:46 GMT