Gurus, Two questions. 1) Is it a valid use-case [even if its possible to model] to have a WSDL 2.0document that has two endpoints that possess identical values for "binding" and "address" attributes [but with different names] ? If not, we could have an "SHOULD" assertion that covers this. 2) Is it possible for the User to model WSDL 2.0 documents that are not WS-I BP compliant ? If so, does it make sense for the Validator to emit warnings on incompatibility ? I am interested in knowing your thoughts on these points. rgds, Ram -- Shift to the left, shift to the right! Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte! -Ramkumar Menon A typical MacroprocessorReceived on Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:42:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:42:05 GMT