Re: Assetions covered by schema validation

Sounds good
Chathura

On 7/11/06, Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> Chathura,
>
> I agree. There is no way to violate this assertion if the component model
> is constructed from a WSDL document. I may just change their @class to
> indicate this rather than delete them. Then they can be filtered from the
> list of assertions we need to test.
>
> Arthur Ryman,
> IBM Software Group, Rational Division
>
> blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
> phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
> assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
> fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
> mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
>
>
>  *"Chathura Herath" <chathurah@gmail.com>*
> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
>
> 07/07/2006 04:45 PM
>   To
> www-ws-desc@w3.org  cc
>
>  Subject
> Assetions covered by schema validation
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
> I have noticed that the following two assertions are covered by the
> schema validation itself. So i see no reason to for their explicit
> declaration. May be we could get rid of them.
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-20060327/#InterfaceFault-0028
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-20060327/#InterfaceOperation-0029
> Regards,
> --
> Chathura Herath
> http://people.apache.org/~chathura/<http://people.apache.org/%7Echathura/>
> http://chathurah.blogspot.com/
>
>
>


-- 
Chathura Herath
http://people.apache.org/~chathura/
http://chathurah.blogspot.com/