W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2006

Re: Assetions covered by schema validation

From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:18:32 -0400
To: "Chathura Herath" <chathurah@gmail.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF0DF2C402.1BB55EA8-ON852571A9.000FC7AC-852571A9.00123C97@ca.ibm.com>
Chathura,

I agree. There is no way to violate this assertion if the component model 
is constructed from a WSDL document. I may just change their @class to 
indicate this rather than delete them. Then they can be filtered from the 
list of assertions we need to test.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca



"Chathura Herath" <chathurah@gmail.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
07/07/2006 04:45 PM

To
www-ws-desc@w3.org
cc

Subject
Assetions covered by schema validation







Hi,
I have noticed that the following two assertions are covered by the
schema validation itself. So i see no reason to for their explicit
declaration. May be we could get rid of them.

http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-20060327/#InterfaceFault-0028
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-20060327/#InterfaceOperation-0029
Regards,
-- 
Chathura Herath
http://people.apache.org/~chathura/
http://chathurah.blogspot.com/
Received on Wednesday, 12 July 2006 03:18:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:41 GMT