W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2005

Agenda, 24 March 2005 WS Desc telcon

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:15:15 -0800
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A506EF7602@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

0.  Dial in information (members only) [.1]:

See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.

If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Mar/0034.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda

1a. Chair: David Orchard
 b. Welcome new member: Charlton Barreto of webMethods replaces 
                        Prasad Yendluri
 c. Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
      Youenn Fablet, Umit Yalcinalp, Paul Downey, Dale Moberg, 
      Jean-Jacques Moreau, Tony Rogers, Rebecca Bergersen, 
      Hugo Haas, Anish Karmarkar, Jeff Mischkinsky, David Orchard

--------------------------------------------------------------------
2.  Approval of minutes:
  - Mar 17 telcon [.1], with JJM's attendance correction [.2]

[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/att-0076/2005031
7-ws-desc-minutes.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0078.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------
3.  Review of Action items [.1].

    Skip review this week.  Please do your AIs!
    We'll review in depth next week.

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions

---------------------------------------------------------------------
4.  Administrivia
  a. Upcoming FTF dates:
   - April 21-22, Mountain View (Microsoft)
     Registration [.1] Logistics [.2]
   - May 30 - June 1 Berlin

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34041/wsdwgf2f0504/
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/Logistics-2005-04-21.html

------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Primer [.1]
 - The following primer sections are due next week!
   + Section 7.2 Features and Properties (Glen)
   + Section 7.3 Import mechanism and authoring style (Arthur)
   + Section 7.4 Multiple Logical WSDL Documents Describing the 
                 Same Service (David)
   + Section 7.5 Versioning and Service Equivalency (Paul)
   + Section 7.8 Operation Style and RPC (Umit)
   + Section 7.11 Service References (Arthur)
   + Section 7.12 XML Schema Examples  (Paul)
   + Section 7.13 Multiple In-Line Schemas (Arthur)
   + Section 7.14 The schemaLocation Attribute (Arthur)
   + Section 7.15 Mapping to RDF and Semantic Web (Bijan Jacek)
 - Sections marked as "at risk" if no volunteer can be found:
   + Section 7.7 Security Considerations

[.1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-primer.ht
ml

------------------------------------------------------------------
6.  Media Type Description issues [.1]
  - Postponed till next week

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#detailList

------------------------------------------------------------------
7.  Last Call Issues [.1].  Comments list [.2]
  - Postponed till next week

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/

------------------------------------------------------------------
This week we'll focus on HTTP-binding related comments.
------------------------------------------------------------------

8. Issue LC28: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0 [.1]
   - "When {http version}="1.0" and {http transfer coding} claim is 
      made, is that an error or should the processors safely ignore 
      it?"
   - Proposal: Ignore it (Asir)

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC28

------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Issue LC47: Issue: describing the HTTP error text for faults [.1]
   - "When binding a fault to the HTTP protocol, we need to be able 
     to specify the error text in addition to the HTTP status code."
   - Need concrete proposal.

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC47

------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: 
                 Bindings (a) [.1]
  - '&' (WSDL) vs. '&' or ';' (XForms)
  - Proposal: allow ';' as well (implied by comment)

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC69a

------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue LC69b: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: 
                 Bindings (b) [.1]
  - XForms supports "multpart/related", WSDL doesn't mention it.
  - Need concrete analysis and proposal.

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC69b

------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue LC77a: Namespaced elements and urlformencoded [.1]
  - "Serialization as 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' does
    not ... explain how namespaced elements are to be serialized."
  - Need concrete proposal.

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC77a

------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue LC77b: Drop HTTP binding [.1]
  - Proposal: Close issue - charter deliverable.

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC77b

------------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue LC 111: HTTP Error code for faults (part3, sec 3.7) [.1]
  - "Would it be possible to add that fault definition SHOULD NOT 
    go against the definition of the HTTP error codes?"
  - Proposal: add such a warning (Yves)

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC111
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 18:15:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:35 GMT