- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:28:09 -0800
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Mar/0037.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Youenn Fablet, Umit Yalcinalp, Paul Downey, Dale Moberg,
Jean-Jacques Moreau, Rebecca Bergersen, Hugo Haas,
Anish Karmarkar, Jeff Mischkinsky
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- Mar 24 telcon [.1]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/att-0087/20050324-ws-desc-minutes.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
AIs are becoming a problem. Suggest a new process:
1) Separate editorial actions from others
2) Assign a due date to each action
Outstanding editorial work:
HOLD 2004-09-16: Editors to move App C to RDF Mapping spec,
except the frag-id which will move
within media-type reg appendix.
? 2004-09-16: Editors to fix paragraph 6-9 of section
2.1.1 moved into 2.1.2
which talks about the syntax.
? 2004-10-14: Editors to add a statement like:
The Style property may constrain both
input and output, however a particular
style may constrain in only one
direction. In Section 2.4.1.1 of Part 1.
? 2004-11-10: Editor remove ambiguity if it exists
? 2005-01-13: Part 1 Editors to incorporate the text
at 2004Dec/0022.html.
? 2005-01-19: Part 1 Editors to call out the difference
between WSDL 1.1 and 2.0 in respect to
single interface per service, and
indicate alternatives
? 2005-01-19: Part 1 Editors to rewrite ONMR as Best
practice.
? 2005-03-10: Editors to check URI and schema references in
Part 1
Assign dates to (or retire) the following AIs:
? 2004-04-01: Marsh will get schema tf going.
? 2004-09-02: Bijan to create stylesheet to generate a
table of components and properties.
? 2004-11-09: DaveO will recast the @compatibleWith
proposal using an extension namespace.
(LC54)
? 2004-11-10: Glen will post an e-mail describing
the compromise proposal on formal objections.
? 2004-11-10: Sanjiva will write up this proposal
and email it to the list as a response
to the objection.
? 2004-11-11: Anish to propose additions to the
test suite for the purpose of
interoperability testing.
? 2004-12-03: Glen and Asir to help craft the specific text
for the editors (LC18).
? 2005-02-17: Jacekk to help Bijan advance the RDF mapping work
? 2005-03-03: Asir to double check the subissues of 76d to
see if they should be raised as issues and to
do so.
? 2005-03-10: Anish and Umit will respond to comments on
media type description documents with our
actions.
? 2005-03-10: Bijan will look at item Editors to move App C
to RDF Mapping spec to see if it is still
relavant
? 2005-03-10: Marsh to troll minutes looking for more CR
criteria.
DONE 2005-03-17: WG members review MTD by next week.
? 2005-03-24: Charlton to propose solution for Issue
LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0
Part 3: Bindings (a)
? 2005-03-24: Charlton to propose text for LC28: HTTP
Transfer Coding and 1.0, per Asir's
proposed resolution
? 2005-03-24: DaveO to dig up his old proposal for
URL-encoding namespaces, for Issue LC77a:
Namespaced elements and urlformencoded
? 2005-03-24: DaveO to figure out when/why multpart/related
got dropped from HTML binding section
? 2005-03-24: DaveO to produce HTTP binding section for primer
? 2005-03-24: DaveO to propose text for Issue LC47:
describing the HTTP error text for faults
? 2005-03-24: DaveO to query MS whether they would support
part of the HTTP binding if divided
? 2005-03-24: Roberto to draft proposal to split HTTP
binding into 3 bindings
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/actions.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Upcoming FTF dates:
- April 21-22, Mountain View (Microsoft)
Registration [.1] Logistics [.2]
- May 30 - June 1 Berlin
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34041/wsdwgf2f0504/
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/Logistics-2005-04-21.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Primer [.1]
- What ever happened to issues 93 and 107? [.2, .3]
- The following primer sections are due today!
+ Section 7.2 Features and Properties (Glen)
+ Section 7.3 Import mechanism and authoring style (Arthur)
+ Section 7.4 Multiple Logical WSDL Documents Describing the
Same Service (David)
+ Section 7.5 Versioning and Service Equivalency (Paul)
+ Section 7.8 Operation Style and RPC (Umit)
+ Section 7.11 Service References (Arthur)
+ Section 7.12 XML Schema Examples (Paul)
+ Section 7.13 Multiple In-Line Schemas (Arthur)
+ Section 7.14 The schemaLocation Attribute (Arthur)
+ DONE: Section 7.15 Mapping to RDF and Semantic Web (Bijan Jacek)
- Sections marked as "at risk" if no volunteer can be found:
+ Section 7.7 Security Considerations
- Does Dan C's issue need to be tracked? [.4]
[.1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-primer.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x93
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x107
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Mar/0004.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Media Type Description issues [.1]
- Larry's response to Issue 268 [.2]
- Joe Fialli has three comments [.3]
- I18N re-review [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#detailList
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0063.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Mar/0017.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2005Mar/0015.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Last Call Issues [.1]. Comments list [.2]
- Define "WSDL 2.0 document" [.3]
- schemaLocation [.4]
- Service Reference problem [.5]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Mar/0009.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0093.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0088.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Issue LC28: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0 [.1]
- "When {http version}="1.0" and {http transfer coding} claim is
made, is that an error or should the processors safely ignore
it?"
- Waiting for text from Charlton.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC28
------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Issue LC47: Issue: describing the HTTP error text for faults [.1]
- "When binding a fault to the HTTP protocol, we need to be able
to specify the error text in addition to the HTTP status code."
- Waiting for text from DaveO.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC47
------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3:
Bindings (a) [.1]
- '&' (WSDL) vs. '&' or ';' (XForms)
- Waiting for text from Charlton
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC69a
------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue LC69b: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3:
Bindings (b) [.1]
- XForms supports "multpart/related", WSDL doesn't mention it.
- Waiting for text from DaveO.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC69b
------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue LC77a: Namespaced elements and urlformencoded [.1]
- "Serialization as 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' does
not ... explain how namespaced elements are to be serialized."
- Waiting for proposal from DaveO.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC77a
------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue LC75u: Add wsdl:documentation to the component model [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75u
------------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue LC80: Extension Components are not Described [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC80
------------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue LC83: The Component Model Does Not Enforce Component
Nesting [.1]
- Parent property
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC83
------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue LC99: Message Reference Component is Underspecified [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC99
------------------------------------------------------------------
17. Issue LC54: WSDL Last Call issue
- Awaiting DaveO's further action to cast @compatibleWith as an
extension
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC54
------------------------------------------------------------------
18. Issue LC84b: [.1]
- Hugo's draft proposal [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC84b
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Feb/0035.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
19. Issue LC74: Idle question [.1]
- Can WSDL 2.0 import WSDL 1.0?
- Note that the resolution to LC5e [.2] defines WSDL Document as
WSDL 2.0 namespace.
- Options:
a) No. Spec (with LC5e resolution) is clear enough.
b) No. Specifically note that i*ing 1.1 docs is not supported.
c) Yes. Change spec to define that this is possible, though
how to turn a WSDL 1.1 doc into WSDL 2.0 components is not
defined.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC74
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC5e
------------------------------------------------------------------
20. Issue LC75w: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments (w) [.1]
- Relax requirement that include href must be dereferencable.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC75w
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2005 19:28:13 UTC