W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Agenda: 9-11 November2004 WS Description WG FTF

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 14:03:24 +0100
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, youenn fablet <yfablet@hotmail.com>
Message-id: <418F6E9C.1010505@crf.canon.fr>

If there's still some flexibility in time, I'd prefer if the SOAP 
binding and feature discussions happenned on Tuesday and Wednesday 
morning (evening here). I'll be dialing in.

Regrets for Tuesday and Wednesday afternoon, and for all of Thursday.

Jonathan Marsh wrote:

>Logistics [1]
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/04-11-f2f.htm
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>Tuesday 9 November
>--------------------------------------------------------
>09:00 Introductions and logistics
>    - Assignment of scribes
>      Youenn Fablet, Glen Daniels, Asir Vedamuthu, Arthur Ryman, 
>      Sanjiva, Kevin Liu, Allen Brookes, Hugo Haas
>    - Agenda bashing
>
>09:10 Scheduling of deliverables
>    - WSDL 2.0 (January CR?)
>    - Primer (Dec WD?)
>    - SOAP 1.1 Binding 
>    - Assigning Media Types Note (Jan?)
>      + Tracking Last Call issues: ExIT? WG issues list?
>
>09:30 Issue LC19: Fault Component Re-usable Across Interfaces [2]
>  - Asir detailed binding changes [3]
>
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC19
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Oct/0057.html
>
>10:30 Break     ----------------------------------------
>
>10:50 Issue LC5f: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance
>                issues (f) [4]
>  - Roberto's proposal [5]
>  - Further list of errors from Roberto [6]
>  - David Booth's suggestion for dropping Processor Conformance [7]
>  - Additional facets to this issue
>    + Some "errors" will be trumped by "fatal errors"
>    + Processing model needed?
>
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC5f
> [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Oct/0027.html
> [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Nov/0008.html
> [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Nov/0015.html
>
>11:50 Issue LC49: Clarify whether Parts 2 & 3 MUST be supported [8]
>
> [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Nov/0015.html
>
>12:00 Lunch     ----------------------------------------
>
>13:00 Issue LC54: WSDL Last Call issue (@compatibleWith proposal) [9]
>      Last discussed at FTF [10]
>
> [9] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC54
>[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Aug/0056.html
>
>14:00 Issue LC29b: Review of WSDL 2.0 Pt 3 Last Call WD (b) [11]
>      Issue LC18: Relationship between Features and SOAP Modules ?? [12]
>    - Awaiting Glen's action
>
>[11] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC29b
>[12] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC18
>
>14:15 Application Data Feature issues:
>    - Issue LC24: "ad:mustUnderstand" - ?? [13]
>    - Issue LC48d: XMLP Review of WSDL 2.0 Part 2 LC WD (d) [14]
>    - Issue LC53: Optional predefined features in Part 2 [15]
>    - Issue LC61f: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (f) [16]
>
>[13] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC24
>[14] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC48d
>[15] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC53
>[16] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC61f
>
>15:00 Break     ----------------------------------------
>
>15:20 Feature/Property Composition Issues
>    - Issue LC20: Feature Composition Edge Cases [17]
>    - Issue LC27: Property Composition Edge Cases [18]
>
>[17] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC20
>[18] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC27
>
>16:00 MEP issues
>    - Issue LC48b: XMLP Review of WSDL 2.0 Part 2 LC WD (b) [19]
>    - Issue LC50: Message Exchange Patterns -- p2c and/or p2e [20]
>    - Issue LC59a: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments (a) [21]
>    - Issue LC59c: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments (c) [22]
>
>[19] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC48b
>[20] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC50
>[21] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC59a
>[22] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC59c
>
>17:00 Adjourn
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>Wednesday 10 November
>-------------------------------------------------------
>09:00 SOAP 1.1 Binding 
>    - First draft [30]
>    - Modified Part 3 (aka, added soap version) [31]
>    - Modified XML Schema for SOAP in WSDL 2.0 [32]
>
>[30]
>http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-soap11-bi
>nding.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
>[31]
>http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/mod-wsdl20-bindi
>ngs.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
>[32]
>http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/mod-wsdl20-soap.
>xsd
>
>09:30 Formal Objections recap
>    - Features and Properties [33]
>      + Glen's presentation to CC Workshop [34]
>    - Lack of compositors [35]
>      + Issue LC59f: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments (f) [36]
>    - Unique GEDs [37]
>
>[33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0375.html
>[34] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Oct/0060.html
>[35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0371.html
>[36] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC59f
>[37] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0376.html
>
>10:30 Break     ----------------------------------------
>
>10:50 Formal Objections (cont.)
>
>11:20 Include/Import issues
>    - Issue LC52a: Last call review comments (a) [37]
>    - Issue LC60: Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNS? [38]
>    - Issue LC74: Idle question [39]
>
>[37] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC52a
>[38] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC60
>[39] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC74
>
>12:00 Lunch     ----------------------------------------
>
>13:00 SOAP binding
>    - Issue LC55: binding/operation/infault|outfault? [40]
>    - Issue LC56: Clarification for binding fault [41]
>    - Issue LC61d: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (d) [42]
>    - Issue LC59b: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments (b) [43]
>    - Issue LC61e: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (e) [44]
>
>[40] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC55
>[41] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC56
>[42] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC61d
>[43] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC59b 
>[44] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC61e
>
>15:00 Break     ----------------------------------------
>
>15:20 Style issues
>    - Issue LC61a: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (a) [45]
>    - Issue LC74d: I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (d) [46]
>
>[45] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC61a 
>[46] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC74d 
>
>16:00 Issue LC59d: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments (d) [47]
> 
>[47] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC59d 
>
>16:30 Issue LC59e: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments (e) [48]
>
>[48] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC59e
>
>17:00 Adjourn
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>Thursday 11 November
>-------------------------------------------------------
>09:00 Test suite issues
>    - Z update?
>
>10:00 Issue LC71: default interface/operation/@pattern [50]
>
>[50] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC50
>
>10:30 Break     ----------------------------------------
>
>10:50 HTTP Binding issues 
>    - Issue LC28: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0 [51]
>    - Issue LC47: Issue: describing the HTTP error text for faults [52]
>    - Issue LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a)
>[53] 
>    - Issue LC69b: XForms comments on (WSDL) 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (b)
>[54]
>
>[51] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC28
>[52] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC47
>[53] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC69a
>[54] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC69b
>
>12:00 Lunch     ----------------------------------------
>
>13:00 Schema Languages
>    - Issue LC63: Mixing Schema Languages [55]
>    - Issue LC70: Pluggability of Schema Languages in WSDL [56]
>
>[55] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC63
>[56] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC70
>
>14:00 Issue LC61b: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (b) [57]
>
>[57] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC61b
>
>14:30 Issue LC61c: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (c) [58]
>
>[58] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC61c
>
>15:00 Break     ----------------------------------------
>
>15:20 Issue LC64: URI References for Schema Components [59]
>
>[59] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC64
>
>16:00 Issue LC72: Faults that are not described in WSDL? [60]
>
>[60] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC72
>
>17:00 Adjourn
>
>
>
>  
>
Received on Monday, 8 November 2004 13:04:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:33 GMT