- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 15:56:53 -0500
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Yesterday I accepted an action item: [NEW] ACTION: dbooth to define the meaning of wsdl:required in terms of the document, rather than processor behavior. I mentioned on the teleconference that I thought we already had wording in the spec to do this, but I wasn't sure. I've checked, and we do. Part 1 section 3.1.1 says: [[ A mandatory extension is an extension that MAY change the meaning of the element to which it is attached, such that the meaning of that element is no longer governed by this specification. Instead, the meaning of an element containing a mandatory extension is governed by the meaning of that extension. Thus, the definition of the element's meaning is delegated to the specification that defines the extension. ]] I think that pretty well covers it. If desired, we might wish to add a note like: [[ It therefore follows that if a WSDL processor does not recognize or understand a mandatory extension that it encounters in a WSDL document, the WSDL processor will have no assurance of understanding the meaning of that WSDL document as a whole. ]] -- David Booth W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 20:56:56 UTC