W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2004

RE: Agenda: 9-11 November2004 WS Description WG FTF

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 16:21:53 -0800
Message-ID: <32D5845A745BFB429CBDBADA57CD41AF0B99A913@ussjex01.amer.bea.com>
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Can we move the LC54 either earlier or later in the day?  I have a firm
12:30 appt.

Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 11:21 PM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Agenda: 9-11 November2004 WS Description WG FTF
> 
> 
> Logistics [1]
> 
>  [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/04-11-f2f.htm
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Tuesday 9 November
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 09:00 Introductions and logistics
>     - Assignment of scribes
>       Youenn Fablet, Glen Daniels, Asir Vedamuthu, Arthur Ryman,
>       Sanjiva, Kevin Liu, Allen Brookes, Hugo Haas
>     - Agenda bashing
> 
> 09:10 Scheduling of deliverables
>     - WSDL 2.0 (January CR?)
>     - Primer (Dec WD?)
>     - SOAP 1.1 Binding
>     - Assigning Media Types Note (Jan?)
>       + Tracking Last Call issues: ExIT? WG issues list?
> 
> 09:30 Issue LC19: Fault Component Re-usable Across Interfaces [2]
>   - Asir detailed binding changes [3]
> 
>  [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC19
>  [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Oct/0057.html
> 
> 10:30 Break     ----------------------------------------
> 
> 10:50 Issue LC5f: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance
>                 issues (f) [4]
>   - Roberto's proposal [5]
>   - Further list of errors from Roberto [6]
>   - David Booth's suggestion for dropping Processor Conformance [7]
>   - Additional facets to this issue
>     + Some "errors" will be trumped by "fatal errors"
>     + Processing model needed?
> 
>  [4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC5f
>  [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Oct/0027.html
>  [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Nov/0008.html
>  [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Nov/0015.html
> 
> 11:50 Issue LC49: Clarify whether Parts 2 & 3 MUST be supported [8]
> 
>  [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Nov/0015.html
> 
> 12:00 Lunch     ----------------------------------------
> 
> 13:00 Issue LC54: WSDL Last Call issue (@compatibleWith proposal) [9]
>       Last discussed at FTF [10]
> 
>  [9] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC54
> [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Aug/0056.html
> 
> 14:00 Issue LC29b: Review of WSDL 2.0 Pt 3 Last Call WD (b) [11]
>       Issue LC18: Relationship between Features and SOAP Modules ??
[12]
>     - Awaiting Glen's action
> 
> [11] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC29b
> [12] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC18
> 
> 14:15 Application Data Feature issues:
>     - Issue LC24: "ad:mustUnderstand" - ?? [13]
>     - Issue LC48d: XMLP Review of WSDL 2.0 Part 2 LC WD (d) [14]
>     - Issue LC53: Optional predefined features in Part 2 [15]
>     - Issue LC61f: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (f) [16]
> 
> [13] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC24
> [14] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC48d
> [15] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC53
> [16] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC61f
> 
> 15:00 Break     ----------------------------------------
> 
> 15:20 Feature/Property Composition Issues
>     - Issue LC20: Feature Composition Edge Cases [17]
>     - Issue LC27: Property Composition Edge Cases [18]
> 
> [17] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC20
> [18] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC27
> 
> 16:00 MEP issues
>     - Issue LC48b: XMLP Review of WSDL 2.0 Part 2 LC WD (b) [19]
>     - Issue LC50: Message Exchange Patterns -- p2c and/or p2e [20]
>     - Issue LC59a: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments (a) [21]
>     - Issue LC59c: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments (c) [22]
> 
> [19] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC48b
> [20] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC50
> [21] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC59a
> [22] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC59c
> 
> 17:00 Adjourn
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Wednesday 10 November
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 09:00 SOAP 1.1 Binding
>     - First draft [30]
>     - Modified Part 3 (aka, added soap version) [31]
>     - Modified XML Schema for SOAP in WSDL 2.0 [32]
> 
> [30]
>
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-soap11-bi
> nding.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
> [31]
>
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/mod-wsdl20-bindi
> ngs.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
> [32]
>
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/mod-wsdl20-soap.
> xsd
> 
> 09:30 Formal Objections recap
>     - Features and Properties [33]
>       + Glen's presentation to CC Workshop [34]
>     - Lack of compositors [35]
>       + Issue LC59f: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments (f) [36]
>     - Unique GEDs [37]
> 
> [33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0375.html
> [34] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Oct/0060.html
> [35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0371.html
> [36] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC59f
> [37] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0376.html
> 
> 10:30 Break     ----------------------------------------
> 
> 10:50 Formal Objections (cont.)
> 
> 11:20 Include/Import issues
>     - Issue LC52a: Last call review comments (a) [37]
>     - Issue LC60: Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNS? [38]
>     - Issue LC74: Idle question [39]
> 
> [37] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC52a
> [38] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC60
> [39] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC74
> 
> 12:00 Lunch     ----------------------------------------
> 
> 13:00 SOAP binding
>     - Issue LC55: binding/operation/infault|outfault? [40]
>     - Issue LC56: Clarification for binding fault [41]
>     - Issue LC61d: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (d) [42]
>     - Issue LC59b: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments (b) [43]
>     - Issue LC61e: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (e) [44]
> 
> [40] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC55
> [41] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC56
> [42] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC61d
> [43] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC59b
> [44] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC61e
> 
> 15:00 Break     ----------------------------------------
> 
> 15:20 Style issues
>     - Issue LC61a: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (a) [45]
>     - Issue LC74d: I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (d) [46]
> 
> [45] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC61a
> [46] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC74d
> 
> 16:00 Issue LC59d: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments (d) [47]
> 
> [47] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC59d
> 
> 16:30 Issue LC59e: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments (e) [48]
> 
> [48] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC59e
> 
> 17:00 Adjourn
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Thursday 11 November
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 09:00 Test suite issues
>     - Z update?
> 
> 10:00 Issue LC71: default interface/operation/@pattern [50]
> 
> [50] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC50
> 
> 10:30 Break     ----------------------------------------
> 
> 10:50 HTTP Binding issues
>     - Issue LC28: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0 [51]
>     - Issue LC47: Issue: describing the HTTP error text for faults
[52]
>     - Issue LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a)
> [53]
>     - Issue LC69b: XForms comments on (WSDL) 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (b)
> [54]
> 
> [51] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC28
> [52] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC47
> [53] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC69a
> [54] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC69b
> 
> 12:00 Lunch     ----------------------------------------
> 
> 13:00 Schema Languages
>     - Issue LC63: Mixing Schema Languages [55]
>     - Issue LC70: Pluggability of Schema Languages in WSDL [56]
> 
> [55] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC63
> [56] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC70
> 
> 14:00 Issue LC61b: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (b) [57]
> 
> [57] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC61b
> 
> 14:30 Issue LC61c: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (c) [58]
> 
> [58] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC61c
> 
> 15:00 Break     ----------------------------------------
> 
> 15:20 Issue LC64: URI References for Schema Components [59]
> 
> [59] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC64
> 
> 16:00 Issue LC72: Faults that are not described in WSDL? [60]
> 
> [60] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC72
> 
> 17:00 Adjourn
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 00:21:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:33 GMT