W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Issue 115

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:26:12 +0600
Message-ID: <0ad701c40bcf$c155d4a0$02c8a8c0@watson.ibm.com>
To: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>, "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, "WS Description List" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

IIRC the request was to explicitly state that extensions change the
semantics. Your wording implies that (adding props to the component
model) but its not explicit.

BTW even optional extensions change the semantics. However, a processor
may ignore the change .. but it still does change the semantics.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>; "WS Description List"
<www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 7:07 AM
Subject: Re: Issue 115


>
> I think the second sentence adds more confusion than clarification,
because
> it doesn't distinguish optional extensions from mandatory extensions.  The
> second sentence was:
> [[
> The presence of extensibility elements and attributes MAY therefore change
> the semantics of a WSDL document.
> ]]
>
> I think it would be better to rename the title of 6.3 to "Extensibility
and
> the Component Model" and delete the second sentence, such that 6.3 reads
only:
>
> [[
> 6.3 Extensibility and the Component Model
>
> As indicated above, it is expected that the presence of extensibility
> elements and attributes will result in additional properties appearing in
> the component model.
> ]]
>
>
> At 10:43 AM 3/15/2004 -0800, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
>
> >The text added so far is at [1].  If this proves adequate, we can
> >reassign this issue to part three while awaiting changes there.
> >
> >[1]
> >http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html#exte
> >nsibility-semantics.
> >
> >
>
> --
> David Booth
> W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 22:28:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:30 GMT