W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

Re: issue 79 is dealt with

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:22:09 +0600
Message-ID: <0acf01c40bcf$401c7880$02c8a8c0@watson.ibm.com>
To: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Done; please verify.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: issue 79 is dealt with


>
> Fine, except I now realize that the first bullet item in the section 7.3
> (Processor Conformance) should clarify that it isn't requiring a
conformant
> processor to accept all mandatory extensions.  Please change the first
> bullet item to:
> [[
> Except as noted below for mandatory extensions, a conformant WSDL
processor
> MUST accept any legal WSDL document as defined by this specification.
> ]]
>
> Furthermore, having read your correspondence with Glen about required
> Features and Properties, I now realize that we should explicitly say that
a
> conformant processor should fault if it doesn't recognize a required
> Feature or Property.  Therefore, please change the fourth bullet item to:
> [[
> If a mandatory extension (i.e., a mandatory element, feature or property)
> is processed, a conformant WSDL processor MUST either agree to fully abide
> by all the rules and semantics signaled by that extension, or immediately
> cease processing (fault). In particular, if the WSDL processor does not
> recognize the extension, it MUST fault. If the WSDL processor recognizes
> the extension, and determines that the extension in question is
> incompatible with any other aspect of the document (including other
> required extensions), it MUST fault.
> ]]
>
> Thanks
>
> At 10:05 PM 3/15/2004 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>
> >I have incorporated David's proposed changes for issue 79:
> >
> >EDTODO    2004-03-04: Editors to incorporate the above proposal to
> >                       issue 79.
> >           2004-03-04: DBooth to propose specific changes needed for
> >                       processor conformance text.
> >
> >David please verify.
> >
> >Jonathan please mark 79 as closed.
> >
> >Sanjiva.
>
> --
> David Booth
> W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 22:24:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:30 GMT