Re: Issue 115

I think the second sentence adds more confusion than clarification, because 
it doesn't distinguish optional extensions from mandatory extensions.  The 
second sentence was:
[[
The presence of extensibility elements and attributes MAY therefore change 
the semantics of a WSDL document.
]]

I think it would be better to rename the title of 6.3 to "Extensibility and 
the Component Model" and delete the second sentence, such that 6.3 reads only:

[[
6.3 Extensibility and the Component Model

As indicated above, it is expected that the presence of extensibility 
elements and attributes will result in additional properties appearing in 
the component model.
]]


At 10:43 AM 3/15/2004 -0800, Jonathan Marsh wrote:

>The text added so far is at [1].  If this proves adequate, we can
>reassign this issue to part three while awaiting changes there.
>
>[1]
>http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html#exte
>nsibility-semantics.
>
>

-- 
David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Telephone: +1.617.253.1273