Re: component designators spec - where art thou?

Hi Arthur,

Can you please update the component designators spec to be
consistent with the new syntax (no <message> etc.)?

If you can start with the version that Jonathan pointed to and
update that then I can easily merge that in to the draft.

Thanks,

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>; <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:11 AM
Subject: Re: component designators spec - where art thou?


> Sanjiva,
>
> I'm not sure what the SHOULD refers to, but the fragment syntax I proposed
> now is consistent with Web Architecture since we recommended that
> namespace URI's point to WSDL documents. The way this works is as follows:
>
> 1. register the new content type with IANA. in our case it is
> application/wsdl+xml
> 2. register/describe the new fragment syntax with the new content type
> registration
>
> Now the algorithm is as follows for intertrepping a URI such as
> namespace-uri#fragment
>
> 1. dereference namespace-uri and get a resource whose content type is
> application/wsdl+xml
> 2. intepret the fragment as defined by application/wsdl+xml - this
> idenitfies a component
>
> The fragment syntax I proposed was compliant with the XPointer Framework.
> The syntax has to be updated to reflect the current state of the spec, but
> the general form is component-type(name-path) where component-type is
> interface, binding, operation, etc, and name-path is the hierarchical path
> formed by the NCNames of the component and its parents, e.g.
> operation(myInterface/myOperation).
>
> Arthur Ryman,
> Rational Desktop Tools Development
>
> phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
> assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
> fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
> mobile: +1-416-939-5063
> intranet: http://w3.torolab.ibm.com/DEAB/
>
>
>
> "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
> 03/15/2004 10:31 AM
>
> To
> <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> cc
>
> Subject
> component designators spec - where art thou?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I'd like to fulfill the following:
>
> EDTODO    2004-03-04: Editors to add back the WSDL Component Designators
>                       back to the spec as SHOULD.
>
> Arthur?
>
>
> Sanjiva.
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 15:48:06 UTC