W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > January 2004

[ rev 1] Agenda: 28-30 Jan 2004 WS Description WG FTF

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:37:15 -0800
Message-ID: <DF1BAFBC28DF694A823C9A8400E71EA20258D468@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "WS Description List" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

[Second draft]

Logistics [1], dial-in numbers [2] (members only).

 [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/04-01-f2f.htm
 [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/04-01-f2f.htm#Bridge

--------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday 28 January
--------------------------------------------------------
13:00 Introductions and logistics
    - Assignment of scribes
        (Igor Sedukhin), Adi Sakala, Arthur Ryman, (Prasad Yendluri), 
        (Dietmar Gaertner), Tom Jordahl, (Jeffrey Schlimmer), 
        Philippe Le Hegaret, William Vambenepe, Umit Yalcinalp
    - Agenda bashing

13:10 Publication plan
      Survey of remaining work
        Part 1: Open issues:
                  misc (16)
                  editorial (2)
        Part 2: Open issues:
                  misc (1)
                  editorial (1)
        Primer: ?

13:30 Faults
    - Issue 105: Abstract Faults [3]
      Work through some WSDL examples to verify that Paul's
      fault proposal [4] doesn't negatively impact bindings.
    - Issue fault-name-uniqueness [5]: Should faults be named with
      QNames? In WSDL 1.1 fault names are NCNames which are not unique
      within portType even. This leads to a cumbersome mechanism to 
      uniquely identify a fault.
    - Issue 89: Binding message references in component model [6]

  [3] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x105
  [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jan/0064.html
  [5] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#xissue%20fault%20name%20uniqueness
  [6] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x89

15:00 Break
15:20 Faults (cont.)

16:30 Joint Session with Arch WG
    - Summary of Arch deliverables and areas WSDesc should be aware of
    - Use Cases document disposition
    - Issue 90: Synchronize terminology [7]
    - Issue 75: Incoherence between WSA and WSD MEPs [8]

  [7] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x90
  [8] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x75

17:30 Adjourn

-------------------------------------------------------
Thursday 29 January
-------------------------------------------------------
09:00 Attribute styles "at risk?"
    - Word from GGF that they don't want attribute styles [10].
    - Issue 103: Proposal for combining the two attribute operation 
      styles to one [11, 12]

 [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jan/0086.html
 [11] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x103
 [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Nov/0164.html

10:30 Break
10:50 Features and properties "at risk?"
    - WSChor statement [13]
    - Issue 108: properties and schema languages other than XSD [14, 15]
      If properties remain, we need to discuss requirements for a
      solution to this issue and recruit a champion.

 [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jan/0066.html
 [14] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x108
 [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jan/0006.html

12:30 Lunch
13:30 WSDL structure issues  
    - Issue X: BEA Simplified Syntax Proposal [16]
      Overview and initial thoughts.
    - Issue X: Headers/Body [17] 
    - Issue 102: Schemas in imported WSDL [18]
      Review Glen's specese [19] 
    - Issue 95: service/@name required? [20]
      Options:
        a) No: remove service/@name
        b) Yes: close issue.
    - Issue 79: How much validation? [21]
      Options:
        a) In scope: need volunteer to write up a proposal.
        b) Out of scope: close issue
    
 [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jan/0071.html
 [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jan/0069.html
 [18] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x102
 [19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jan/0017.html
 [20] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x95
 [21] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x79

15:00 Break
15:20 Structural issues (cont.)

16:00 Inheritance issues:
    - Issue 76: Pointing at derived interfaces [22]
      Options: 
        a) Yes: need volunteer to write up a proposal.
        b) No: close issue
    - Issue 81: Account for interface inheritance [23]
      Options:
        a) Yes: come up with an alternative.
        b) No: close issue      

 [22] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x76
 [23] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x81

17:30 Adjourn

-------------------------------------------------------
Friday 30 January
-------------------------------------------------------
09:00 Binding issues:
    - Issue 80: Inappropriate binding component name [30]
      Options:
        a) Yes: come up with an alternative name.
        b) No: close issue
    - Issue 82: Relax binding syntax [31]
      Need proposal to understand the scope of this issue.
    - Issue 83: Interaction between binding extensions [32]
      Options:
        a) In scope: come up with a proposal.
        b) Out of scope: close issue.

 [30] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x80
 [31] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x82
 [32] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x83

10:30 Break
10:50 Issue 109: Versioning [33]
    - Required reading (DavidO) [34]
    - Use Cases (DavidO) [35]
    - Requirements (PaulD) [36]

 [33] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x109 
 [34] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jan/0098.html
 [35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jan/0070.html
 [36] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jan/0076.html

12:30 Lunch
13:30 Issue 96: Support for SOAP intermediaries [37]
      Need an analysis on whether there are issues here.

 [37] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x96

14:30 Issue 87: Redundant direction information [38]
      Options:
        a) Drop direction property.
        b) Retain direction property.

 [38] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x87

15:00 Break
15:20 Style issues
    - Issue 98: > 1 style per interface [39]
      Options:
        a) Yes: Make @style an (unordered?) list of URIs.
        b) No: Close issue.
    - Issue X: Jacek's proposal to remove style attribute 
      and handle this using normal extensibility. [40]

 [39] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x98
 [40] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jan/0054.html

16:00 Media type TF report (preliminary) [41]

 [41]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-media-types/2004Jan/0001.h
tml

16:30 Planning for remaining Part 1 issues.
    - Issue 97: Schema language for SOAP encoding [42]
      If such a language appears, what status would we give it?
    - Issue 104: Appendix E cleanup [43]
    - Issue 106: Using RDF in WSDL [44, 45]

 [42] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x97
 [43] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x104
 [44] http://tinyurl.com/ysgl#x106
 [45] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0076.html

17:00 Adjourn
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2004 14:37:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:28 GMT