RE: Proposal for advertising QoS features of a Web service in WSDL

Understood.

Thanks,
Joel Munter, Intel
desk: 480.552.3076
cell:  602.790.0924
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Webber [mailto:jim.webber@arjuna.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 8:46 AM
To: Munter, Joel D; www-ws-desc@w3.org
Cc: 'Savas Parastatidis'
Subject: RE: Proposal for advertising QoS features of a Web service in
WSDL

Hi Joel,

> This is a neat and simple idea.  From an editorial nature, 
> you may have left an inadvertent wstx:transactional on page 2 
> (in the description following the XML example).  It looks as 
> though you replaced all of these with wstx:supports.  

Ah, thanks for pointing that out. I have to say we were proposing more a
general concept than a finished polished item, so there may be more of
these.

> Why do you refer to security as a non-functional requirement?

Because when I want to do something, say buy a CD, that is the
functionality
that I am interested in. The fact that I am doing it in a secure way,
and
perhaps that a transaction is running between the CD seller service,
myself,
and the credit card service is all non-functional - it's orthogonal to
the
business logic.

Jim