- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:06:37 -0800
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <00ac01c2c7b8$c9355260$4b0ba8c0@beasys.com>
On issue 8b, please remember that I did volunteer to help if needed.
Cheers,
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:07 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Agenda for 29 January 2003 WS Description WG
>
>
>
> 0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
>
> See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents
> and other
> information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
>
> If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
> before the start of the telcon.
>
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003Jan/0038.html
> [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
> [.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Agenda
>
> 1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is:
> Steve Tuecke (fallbacks Sandeep Kumar, Sanjiva Weerawarana,
> Jeff Mischkinsky, Waqar Sadiq)
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2. Approval of minutes of Jan 16 telcon [.1]
> Approval of minutes of the FTF [.2, .3, .4] and the summary [.5]
>
> [.1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/att-00
> 40/01-minu
> tes-20030116.html
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0105.html
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0106.html
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0107.html
> [.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0108.html
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 3. Review of Action items [.1].
> PENDING 2002-11-21: Jonathan to refer R120 text to TAG, referencing
> TAG
> issue fragmentinXML-28, when that text
> appears in
> the draft.
> ? 2002-12-19: Jacek to write up text on SOAP response
> MEP after
>
> Don send his proposal for request/response MEP
> DONE [.2] 2003-01-09: Editors to have a draft ready a week from
> tomorrow.
> DONE [.3] 2003-01-09: Gudge and sanjiva to prepare in time
> for the f2f
> a draft of the abstract model for interactions.
> DONE [.4] 2003-01-16: Roberto to provide discussion outline for f2f
> ? 2003-01-16: Sanjiva to explain why naming faults is
> unnecessary
> RETIRED 2003-01-16: Don to write up input-output MEP
> DONE [.5] 2003-01-16: Amy to write up output-input MEP
> DONE [.6] 2003-01-16: Amy will try to get something out by tomorrow
> (Friday)
> on what the collection of issues are.
> ? 2003-01-20: Glen, Amy, Youenn, Sanjiva, JJM to form a TF on
> comparing the features/properties and existing
> extensibility mechanisms, to illustrate
> feature/property rationale, use cases, and
> examples.
> DONE [.7] 2003-01-21: Gudge write up this proposal for
> operation naming
> by next week.
> ? 2003-01-21: Umit to send Gudge and Roberto a knarly XML
> Schema type example.
> ? 2003-01-21: Roberto and gudge to create a branch
> and work up
> a binding proposal based on referencing type
> systems directly from operation components.
> (Umit's example, Sanjiva's example, WSDL 1.1
> example, and others.)
> ? 2003-01-21: Issues list maintainer to check that we have an
> issue regarding being able to specify
> the verb on
> a per operation basis.
> ? 2003-01-21: Prasad to raise issue of same namespace imports
> with
> WS-I BP.
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: Jeffrey to rephrase requirements R118,
> R058, and
> point out reqs that seem to specify a design an
> propose rewording.
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#1: Jeffrey to document as a non-requirement.
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#3: Jeffrey to add requirement (suitably
> worded).
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#4: Jeffrey to add this requirement.
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#5: Jeffrey to reword req 5 and DaveO
> to review
> it
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#6: Jonathan to add this on our cut list and
> wait
> for william.
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#7: Jeffrey to add this reworded req. (?)
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#9: Jeffrey to add the reworded requirement
> "Description language must or should
> provide for
> description of optional content."
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#10: Jeffrey to propose wording for
> requirement
> related to a portReference construct.
>
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
> [.2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0098.html
> [.3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/att-00
> 43/01-inte
> raction-patterns-jan-18-2003.html
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0066.html
> [.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0035.html
> [.6]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0033.html
> [.7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0078.html
> [.8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0113.html
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 4. Administrivia
> a. Register for March FTF [.1]
> b. Usage Scenarios revitalization.
>
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003Jan/0003.html
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 5. New Issues. Merged issues list [.1].
> - none?
>
> [.1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-is
> sues.html
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 6. Operation name uniqueness. Gudge's draft [.1].
>
> [.1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12
> .xml?rev=1
> .37.2.1&content-type=text/xml
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 7. MEPs
> 7a. Can we close issue-extensible-message-exchange-patterns? [.1]
> 7b. Amy's comments on asynchronicity [.2]
> 7c. "From the point of view of the service" [.3]
> 7d. Youenn's syntax proposal [.4]
> 7e. reverse of out-(in|fault)* [.5]
>
> [.1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-is
> sues.html#
> xissue%20extensible%20message%20exchange%20patterns
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0080.html
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0112.html
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0100.html
> [.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0101.html
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 8. Requirements [.1]. FTF resolutions [.2]
> 8a. DRAFT R129 "The description language SHOULD allow specifying
> the MIME media type of message content."
> 8b. DRAFT R130 "The WG SHOULD define components that may be used
> within Messages to refer to other WSDL components."
> 8c. Issue 71? [.3]
>
> [.1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/requirements/
ws-desc-re
qs.xml
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0113.html
[.3]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.xml#x
71
--------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Properties and features. Summary at [.1].
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0033.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Removing message. Roberto's proposal at [.1].
Waiting revised proposal from Roberto. Direction suggested by Dale [.2]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Nov/0035.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Dec/0040.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
11. HTTP Binding Issues (6a, 41)
Jeffrey recommends no change [.1].
Sanjiva is mulling this over [.2].
Dependent upon Glen's feature/property proposal.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0102.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0067.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
12. BindingType proposal from Kevin [.1]. Updated proposal at [.2].
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Aug/0009.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0068.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue 28: transport='uri' [.1]
Dependent upon Glen's feature/property proposal.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x28
--------------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue 2: SOAPAction has been deprecated, as of SOAP 1.2 [.1].
Jean-Jacques proposal at [.2].
Jacek's addendum at [.3].
Dependent upon Glen's feature/property proposal.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x2
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0050.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0056.html
- Jonathan
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2003 12:08:27 UTC