W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > January 2003

RE: Agenda for 29 January 2003 WS Description WG

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:06:37 -0800
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00ac01c2c7b8$c9355260$4b0ba8c0@beasys.com>
On issue 8b, please remember that I did volunteer to help if needed.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:07 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Agenda for 29 January 2003 WS Description WG
> 
> 
> 
> 0.  Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
> 
> See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents 
> and other
> information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters. 
> 
> If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
> before the start of the telcon.
> 
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003Jan/0038.html
> [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
> [.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Agenda
> 
> 1.  Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is:
>       Steve Tuecke (fallbacks Sandeep Kumar, Sanjiva Weerawarana, 
>       Jeff Mischkinsky, Waqar Sadiq)
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2.  Approval of minutes of Jan 16 telcon [.1]
>     Approval of minutes of the FTF [.2, .3, .4] and the summary [.5]
> 
> [.1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/att-00
> 40/01-minu
> tes-20030116.html
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0105.html
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0106.html
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0107.html
> [.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0108.html
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 3.  Review of Action items [.1].
> PENDING   2002-11-21: Jonathan to refer R120 text to TAG, referencing
> TAG
>                       issue fragmentinXML-28, when that text 
> appears in 
>                       the draft. 
> ?         2002-12-19: Jacek to write up text on SOAP response 
>  MEP after
> 
>                       Don send his proposal for request/response MEP  
> DONE [.2] 2003-01-09: Editors to have a draft ready a week from
> tomorrow. 
> DONE [.3] 2003-01-09: Gudge and sanjiva to prepare in time 
> for the f2f 
>                       a draft of the abstract model for interactions. 
> DONE [.4] 2003-01-16: Roberto to provide discussion outline for f2f 
> ?         2003-01-16: Sanjiva to explain why naming faults is
> unnecessary 
> RETIRED   2003-01-16: Don to write up input-output MEP 
> DONE [.5] 2003-01-16: Amy to write up output-input MEP
> DONE [.6] 2003-01-16: Amy will try to get something out by tomorrow
> (Friday)
>                       on what the collection of issues are. 
> ?         2003-01-20: Glen, Amy, Youenn, Sanjiva, JJM to form a TF on 
>                       comparing the features/properties and existing 
>                       extensibility mechanisms, to illustrate 
>                       feature/property rationale, use cases, and
> examples.
> DONE [.7] 2003-01-21: Gudge write up this proposal for 
> operation naming 
>                       by next week.
> ?         2003-01-21: Umit to send Gudge and Roberto a knarly XML 
>                       Schema type example.
> ?         2003-01-21: Roberto and gudge to create a branch 
> and work up 
>                       a binding proposal based on referencing type 
>                       systems directly from operation components. 
>                       (Umit's example, Sanjiva's example, WSDL 1.1 
>                       example, and others.)
> ?         2003-01-21: Issues list maintainer to check that we have an 
>                       issue regarding being able to specify 
> the verb on 
>                       a per operation basis.
> ?         2003-01-21: Prasad to raise issue of same namespace imports
> with 
>                       WS-I BP.
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: Jeffrey to rephrase requirements R118, 
> R058, and 
>                       point out reqs that seem to specify a design an
>                       propose rewording.
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#1: Jeffrey to document as a non-requirement.
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#3: Jeffrey to add requirement (suitably
> worded).
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#4: Jeffrey to add this requirement.
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#5: Jeffrey to reword req 5 and DaveO 
> to review
> it
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#6: Jonathan to add this on our cut list and
> wait 
>                       for william.
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#7: Jeffrey to add this reworded req. (?)
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#9: Jeffrey to add the reworded requirement
>                       "Description language must or should 
> provide for 
>                       description of optional content."
> DONE [.8] 2003-01-22: DO#10: Jeffrey to propose wording for 
> requirement
>                       related to a portReference construct.
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
> [.2] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0098.html 
> [.3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/att-00
> 43/01-inte
> raction-patterns-jan-18-2003.html
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0066.html
> [.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0035.html
> [.6] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0033.html 
> [.7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0078.html
> [.8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0113.html
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 4.  Administrivia
>   a. Register for March FTF [.1]
>   b. Usage Scenarios revitalization.
> 
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003Jan/0003.html
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 5.  New Issues.  Merged issues list [.1].
> - none?
> 
> [.1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-is
> sues.html
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 6.  Operation name uniqueness.  Gudge's draft [.1].
> 
> [.1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12
> .xml?rev=1
> .37.2.1&content-type=text/xml
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 7.  MEPs
> 7a. Can we close issue-extensible-message-exchange-patterns? [.1]
> 7b. Amy's comments on asynchronicity [.2]
> 7c. "From the point of view of the service" [.3]
> 7d. Youenn's syntax proposal [.4]
> 7e. reverse of out-(in|fault)* [.5]
> 
> [.1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-is
> sues.html#
> xissue%20extensible%20message%20exchange%20patterns
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0080.html
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0112.html
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0100.html
> [.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0101.html
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 8.  Requirements [.1].  FTF resolutions [.2]
> 8a. DRAFT R129 "The description language SHOULD allow specifying 
>     the MIME media type of message content."
> 8b. DRAFT R130 "The WG SHOULD define components that may be used
>     within Messages to refer to other WSDL components."
> 8c. Issue 71? [.3]
> 
> [.1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/requirements/
ws-desc-re
qs.xml
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0113.html
[.3]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.xml#x
71

-------------------------------------------------------------------- 
9.  Properties and features.  Summary at [.1].

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0033.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Removing message.  Roberto's proposal at [.1].

Waiting revised proposal from Roberto.  Direction suggested by Dale [.2]

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Nov/0035.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Dec/0040.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------
11. HTTP Binding Issues (6a, 41)
    Jeffrey recommends no change [.1].
    Sanjiva is mulling this over [.2].
    Dependent upon Glen's feature/property proposal.

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0102.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0067.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------
12. BindingType proposal from Kevin [.1].  Updated proposal at [.2].

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Aug/0009.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0068.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue 28: transport='uri' [.1]
    Dependent upon Glen's feature/property proposal.

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x28

--------------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue 2: SOAPAction has been deprecated, as of SOAP 1.2 [.1].
    Jean-Jacques proposal at [.2].
    Jacek's addendum at [.3].
    Dependent upon Glen's feature/property proposal.

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x2
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0050.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0056.html

- Jonathan



Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2003 12:08:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:22 GMT