W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2002

RE: XSD vs. WSDL import

From: Dave Hollander <dmh@contivo.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:29:31 -0700
Message-ID: <BD52C6379806D51188DD00508BEEC96C4B6567@mail.contivo.com>
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
+1  - using the same term for different behavior seems very dangerous!
 
DaveH

-----Original Message-----
From: Don Box [mailto:dbox@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:23 AM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: XSD vs. WSDL import



If WSDL is going to define an element whose [local name], [children] and
[attributes] have a one to one correspondence to something defined in XML
Schema, it seems prudent to reuse the behavior as well (especially since
virtually all WSDL users are also XML Schema users). I worry about having
<wsdl:import> look and smell like <xsd:import> but to not work the same way.

 

If the WG is going to go with a single element that subsumes most of
<xsd:include> and <xsd:import> functionality (except for WSDL), I would
prefer to see the WG coin a new element name (perhaps Sanjiva's <wsdl:using>
suggestion).

 

DB

 
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2002 11:30:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:21 GMT