RE: A modest proposal on WSDL semantics

+1 to Option 2a

>Option 2a: Suggest but don't require defining semantics.  Add something
to >the spec along the lines of:
>
>"The targetNamespace URI represents an unambiguous name for the
intended >semantics of the WSDL document.  The targetNamespace URI
SHOULD point to a >human or machine processable document that directly
or indirectly defines >the semantics of the WSDL document."

--Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Booth [mailto:dbooth@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:52 PM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: A modest proposal on WSDL semantics
> 
> 
> I have drafted a brief, modest proposal for addressing semantics in
WSDL
> 1.2:
> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wsdl-semantics-dbooth/semantics_clean.htm
> I'm interested to hear whether people find this proposal reasonable.
> 
> --
> David Booth
> W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> Telephone: +1.617.253.1273