Re: Issue: should inout parameters be of the same type?

You are getting me confused... Are you referring to the SOAP request-response
MEP? If so, this MEP only relates to the SOAP RPC convention in so far as the
RPC convention can use the services of the SOAP request-response MEP. If not,
what do you have in mind?

Jean-Jacques.

James M Snell wrote:

> As long as this constraint only affects the RPC binding.  It is quite
> possible that in a Request/Response message exchange, two messages may
> have similarly named parts but do not reflect an in/out parameter.  It's
> only when the Request/Response MEP is implemented for RPC that this
> becomes an issue.