W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2002

Re: Revised extensibility proposal

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 18:08:17 +0200
Message-ID: <3CEBC271.C0B1ABE2@crf.canon.fr>
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org
+1 for Jonathan's proposal.

Jonathan Marsh wrote:

> I still don't see why a simpler proposal won't work:
> 1) Open the content model to elements and attributes in other
> namespaces.
> 2) Mark required extensions with a <wsdl:extension namespace="..."/>
> element.
> 3) An interpreter of the WSDL document, encountering an element or
> attribute marked as a required extension but not recognizing the
> namespace of that element, must interpret the entire WSDL document as
> "not understood".
> 4) Certain elements can accept "architected extensions" which means they
> don't have to be declared using the extension mechanism.  These are not
> really extensions at all, just boundaries between embedded namespaces.
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 12:09:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT