W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > April 2003

RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call

From: Newcomer, Eric <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:01:34 -0500
Message-ID: <DCF6EF589A22A14F93DFB949FD8C4AB20107419A@amereast-ems1.IONAGLOBAL.COM>
To: "Jeckle, Mario" <mario@jeckle.de>
Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>


Regarding security, it was positioned as an "orthogonal" (maybe not exactly the right term) concept, meaning it applies to all layers, as does management.

I am not sure it is helpful to additionally list it in any of the layers since the right hand security box is intended to imply that security applies to all layers.  This would have to be explained in accompanying text.



-----Original Message-----
From: Jeckle, Mario 
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:30 PM
To: Newcomer, Eric
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Re: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call


 >But I have one question for you -- what about the transport layer?
 >Are you implying by omitting them from your diagram that they should 
be omitted from the stack diagram?
 >Or perhaps underneath everything?
Oops. Sorry. I missed the transport layer.
It should be right under the XML Base Technology layer.
I added it to the diagram and attached a new version.

Note the double mention of security (once within the Messaging layer and 
once as separate overall topic) could be regarded as redundant. From my 
point of view the additional mentioning of security within the messaging 
  layer (more precisely: within the SOAP Extensions layer) makes since 
SOAP requires extra work to bring in security.

What do you think?


Prof. Mario Jeckle
University of Applied Sciences Furtwangen
Dept. Business Applications of Computer Science

W3C Representative of DaimlerChrysler Research and Technology

URL: http://www.jeckle.de

My public key: http://www.jeckle.de/marioJeckle.pgp
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2003 10:01:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:06 UTC