Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 06:29:45 +0200
Message-ID: <3E8A6739.7040400@jeckle.de>
To: "Newcomer, Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>
CC: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Eric, >But I have one question for you -- what about the transport layer? >Are you implying by omitting them from your diagram that they should be omitted from the stack diagram? >Or perhaps underneath everything? Oops. Sorry. I missed the transport layer. It should be right under the XML Base Technology layer. I added it to the diagram and attached a new version. Note the double mention of security (once within the Messaging layer and once as separate overall topic) could be regarded as redundant. From my point of view the additional mentioning of security within the messaging layer (more precisely: within the SOAP Extensions layer) makes since SOAP requires extra work to bring in security. What do you think? Mario -- Prof. Mario Jeckle University of Applied Sciences Furtwangen Dept. Business Applications of Computer Science W3C Representative of DaimlerChrysler Research and Technology URL: http://www.jeckle.de MailTo:mario@jeckle.de MailTo:jeckle@fh-furtwangen.de My public key: http://www.jeckle.de/marioJeckle.pgp
(image/png attachment: WSAStackDiagram.png)