W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > February 2003

Re: WOWG: agenda Feb 20 telecon

From: Deborah McGuinness <dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:14:49 -0800
Message-ID: <3E53F3C9.816AC4CE@ksl.stanford.edu>
To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
CC: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

I will need to leave early from tomorrow morning's telecon - about 9:45 pacific time.
Is it possible to include issues impacting the overview and me earlier?
I think the main one is 3.4 below.  (Overview has been published and I have updated the
editors draft with the list sent out by jim).

thx,
deborah

Guus Schreiber wrote:

> WEB ONTOLOGY WORKING GROUP
> AGENDA/LOGISTICS
> February 20, 2003
>
> 1200 US East Coast
> 0900 US West Coast
> 1700 London
> 0200 Tokyo (next day)
>
> Duration: 90 minutes
>
> PHONE INFORMATION
> To use Zakim:
> Dial +1.617.761.6200
> At the "enter your passcode followed by the pound key" message,
> enter 9326#.
> Note: When you join the telecon please state your name
>
> CHAT INFO
> Simultaneous IRC Chat
> irc:irc.w3.org (port 6665)
> #webont
>
> Chair: Jim Hendler
> Scribe: Leo Obrst
>
> 1) ADMIN (10-15 min)
>
> 1.1 Role Call
>
> Regrets: Klein
> See list archive for last-minute regrets
>
> 1.2 Approval of Minutes of last telecon
>
> PROPOSED to accept the following as a true record of Feb 13
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0193.html
>
> 1.3 Agenda Amendments
>
> 1.4 Telecon Schedule
>
> Next telecon: February 27
> Scribe:   TBD
>
> 1.5  Tech plenary
>
> Tech plenary page:
> http://www.w3.org/2002/10/allgroupoverview.html
>
> - Mar 4: editor's meeting on Tuesday
>
> - Mar 6-7: Initial Tech Plenary Semantic Web Architecture page -
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/meetings/tech-200303/
>
> ACTION cahris: speaker phone at Tech plenary on Tuesday
>
> ACTION Jeremy: propose to discuss social meaning at tech plenary
> DONE:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0196.html
>
> 2. RESPONSE TO RDFCore LC (10 min)
>
> ACTION Guus summary review of RDF Schema doc as proposal for the WG
> ->
> The chairs will sned a draft response to the list with a draft WG
> response, including the detailed comments of Volz and ter Horst, the
> XMLLiteral issue, and the (mixed) views on the social meaning issue.
>
> Context:
> Review by Volz of RDF Schema doc:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0064.html
> Review by ter Horst of RDF Semantics doc:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0067.html
> Review by Baget of RDF Concepts doc:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0176.html
>
> 3 ISSUETTES (45-55 min)
>
> 3.1 Actions wrt. resolutions
>
> ACTION Jeremy to add 0542 case to test suite
>
> Action Carroll: XMLLiteral response to RDFCore
> DONE:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0194.html
>
> ACTION Jeremy: to produce test case for XML literal
>
> ACTION Guus: explain AnnototationProperty in ref
>
> ACTION Guus: specify in owl.owl that label, seeAlso, isDefinedBy
> DONE:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0277.html
>
> ACTION Mike S. will update guide to discuss annotations
>
> 3.2 OWL DL syntax
>
> See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0489.html
>
> Carroll's OWL Syntax doc:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0146.html
>
> Note from Jeremy:  the differences section highlights the crucial
> differences everything else is either an orthogonal issuette, a bugfix or a
> trade-off.
>
> Response by Peter:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0161.html
>
> See also: threed on complex restrictions:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0266.html
>
> 3.3 RDF compatibility
>
> See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0083.html
>
> Proposal to resolve by Carroll:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0086.html
>
> Discussion:
> Patel-Schenider:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0094.html
>
> Relevant input: Carrol's OWL syntax note:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0146.html
>
> Note from Carroll wrt. the latter: In the differences section
>    http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/owl-syntax/2003-12-Feb/diffs.html
> under RDF Compatibility/builtin names we see this issuette relates to one
> sentence of the mapping rules that excludes lots, and I instead propose
> that
> we allow everything unless it is prohibited by the table of urirefs
>
> http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/owl-syntax/2003-12-Feb/dl-syntax.html#builtin-urirefs
>
> 3.4 Relation RDFS and OWL Lite
>
> Context: see message by Hendler:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0130.html
>
> See also prior discussion in October:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Oct/0310.html
>
> 3.5 Imports and entailments
>
> Context: Carroll's message:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0014.html
>
> ACTION: Ian to get Sean to generate syntax checker test case for imports
> (i.e., on failure assume doc is OWL-FULL)
> DONE:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0207.html
>
> ACTION Jos: send negative experience on imports to list
> DONE:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0192.html
>
> 4. DOCUMENT STATUS (10-15 min.)
>
> ACTION: Massimo publish reference (continued)
>
> ACTION: Connolly get Tests published
> DONE   http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/
>
> ACTION: Connolly re: security
>
> ACTION: Jeremy/HP review Reference
>
> ACTION: Jim review Reference
> DONE
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0264.html
>
> - Planning for LC candidate documents
> - For all editors: include member list in ack section
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0263.html
>
> 6. AOB (0-5 min.)
>
> --
> A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam,
> http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html

--
 Deborah L. McGuinness
 Knowledge Systems Laboratory
 Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241
 Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020
 email: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu
 URL: http://ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/index.html
 (voice) 650 723 9770    (stanford fax) 650 725 5850   (computer fax)  801 705 0941
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:11:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:57 GMT