W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > February 2003

WOWG: agenda Feb 20 telecon

From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:06:05 +0100
Message-ID: <3E53C78D.6050702@swi.psy.uva.nl>
To: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

WEB ONTOLOGY WORKING GROUP
AGENDA/LOGISTICS
February 20, 2003

1200 US East Coast
0900 US West Coast
1700 London
0200 Tokyo (next day)


Duration: 90 minutes

PHONE INFORMATION
To use Zakim:
Dial +1.617.761.6200
At the "enter your passcode followed by the pound key" message,
enter 9326#.
Note: When you join the telecon please state your name

CHAT INFO
Simultaneous IRC Chat
irc:irc.w3.org (port 6665)
#webont

Chair: Jim Hendler
Scribe: Leo Obrst


1) ADMIN (10-15 min)


1.1 Role Call

Regrets: Klein
See list archive for last-minute regrets


1.2 Approval of Minutes of last telecon

PROPOSED to accept the following as a true record of Feb 13
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0193.html


1.3 Agenda Amendments


1.4 Telecon Schedule

Next telecon: February 27
Scribe:   TBD


1.5  Tech plenary

Tech plenary page:
http://www.w3.org/2002/10/allgroupoverview.html

- Mar 4: editor's meeting on Tuesday

- Mar 6-7: Initial Tech Plenary Semantic Web Architecture page -
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/meetings/tech-200303/

ACTION cahris: speaker phone at Tech plenary on Tuesday

ACTION Jeremy: propose to discuss social meaning at tech plenary
DONE:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0196.html


2. RESPONSE TO RDFCore LC (10 min)

ACTION Guus summary review of RDF Schema doc as proposal for the WG
->
The chairs will sned a draft response to the list with a draft WG
response, including the detailed comments of Volz and ter Horst, the
XMLLiteral issue, and the (mixed) views on the social meaning issue.

Context:
Review by Volz of RDF Schema doc:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0064.html
Review by ter Horst of RDF Semantics doc:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0067.html
Review by Baget of RDF Concepts doc:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0176.html


3 ISSUETTES (45-55 min)


3.1 Actions wrt. resolutions


ACTION Jeremy to add 0542 case to test suite

Action Carroll: XMLLiteral response to RDFCore
DONE:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0194.html

ACTION Jeremy: to produce test case for XML literal

ACTION Guus: explain AnnototationProperty in ref

ACTION Guus: specify in owl.owl that label, seeAlso, isDefinedBy
DONE:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0277.html

ACTION Mike S. will update guide to discuss annotations


3.2 OWL DL syntax

See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0489.html

Carroll's OWL Syntax doc:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0146.html

Note from Jeremy:  the differences section highlights the crucial
differences everything else is either an orthogonal issuette, a bugfix or a
trade-off.

Response by Peter:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0161.html

See also: threed on complex restrictions:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0266.html


3.3 RDF compatibility

See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0083.html

Proposal to resolve by Carroll:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0086.html

Discussion:
Patel-Schenider:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0094.html

Relevant input: Carrol's OWL syntax note:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0146.html

Note from Carroll wrt. the latter: In the differences section
   http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/owl-syntax/2003-12-Feb/diffs.html
under RDF Compatibility/builtin names we see this issuette relates to one
sentence of the mapping rules that excludes lots, and I instead propose 
that
we allow everything unless it is prohibited by the table of urirefs
 
http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/owl-syntax/2003-12-Feb/dl-syntax.html#builtin-urirefs


3.4 Relation RDFS and OWL Lite

Context: see message by Hendler:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0130.html

See also prior discussion in October:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Oct/0310.html


3.5 Imports and entailments

Context: Carroll's message:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0014.html

ACTION: Ian to get Sean to generate syntax checker test case for imports
(i.e., on failure assume doc is OWL-FULL)
DONE:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0207.html

ACTION Jos: send negative experience on imports to list
DONE:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0192.html


4. DOCUMENT STATUS (10-15 min.)

ACTION: Massimo publish reference (continued)

ACTION: Connolly get Tests published
DONE   http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/

ACTION: Connolly re: security

ACTION: Jeremy/HP review Reference

ACTION: Jim review Reference
DONE
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0264.html

- Planning for LC candidate documents
- For all editors: include member list in ack section
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0263.html


6. AOB (0-5 min.)


-- 
A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam,
http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2003 13:06:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:57 GMT