W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > July 2002

Re: new issue? should OWL provide synonyms for RDF and RDFS objects

From: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:04:13 -0400
Message-Id: <200207181904.PAA12436@cam-mbx1.bbn.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

> I suggest it subsumes the suggestion from Mike Dean about
>   TITLE:  owl:Class still needed
> of 17 Jul 2002 20:08:13 -0400

Not if owl:Class is a subclass of rdfs:Class, which it
currently is (taken from daml:Class).

If we determine that sameClassAs can be used, then I agree.

Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 15:04:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:51 GMT